 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
圖像學和符號學 : 敦煌藝術史學的方法論前景=Iconology and Semiotics: The Prospect of Methodology in the Study of Dunhuang Art History |
|
|
|
| Author |
岳鋒 (著)=Yue, Feng (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
新疆藝術學院學報=Journal of Xinjiang Arts University
|
|---|
| Volume | v.4 n.4 |
|---|
| Date | 2006.12 |
|---|
| Pages | 28 - 31 |
|---|
| Publisher | 新疆藝術學院 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.xjart.edu.cn/xuebao/xuebaoindex.html
|
|---|
| Location | 烏魯木齊, 中國 [Urumqi, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位：西北師範大學美術學院 |
|---|
| Keyword | 敦煌藝術=Dunhuang art; 圖像學=Iconology; 符號學=Semiotics; 方法論=Methodology |
|---|
| Abstract | 圖像學和符號學同屬於西方學術研究的模式，都可應用於視覺文化的研究。在已有的敦煌藝術研究成果中，既有圖像學的近似性，也有符號學方法的初步介入，及時總結和研究這些新動向，系統地分析圖像學和符號學的理論方法，有利於敦煌藝術史學在更為廣闊的視野中深入發展，也必將會對中國當代藝術發展產生積極的影響。
Iconology and Semiotics are the models applied in the western academic study. Meanwhile, they can be employed in the study of visual culture. There was not only the similarity of Iconology but also the initial introduction of Semiotics in the existing achievements of Dunhuang art study. To summarize and study these new trends promptly and to analyze the theoretical methods of Iconology and Semiotics systematically is good to the deeper development of Dunhuang art history in the wider horizon and has a positive effect on the modern art development in China. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、敦煌藝術研究中的圖像學近似 28
二、符號學介入敦煌藝術研究 29
三、藝術史學中的「後形式主義」傾向 30
四、結語 30 |
|---|
| ISSN | 16724577 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 459 |
|---|
| Created date | 2009.04.17 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.05.20 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
