|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Suttas on Sakka and why the Shorter Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama should not be attributed to the Kāsyapīya school |
|
|
|
| Author |
Bingenheimer, Marcus
|
|---|
| Source |
Buddhist Studies Review
|
|---|
| Volume | v.26 n.2 |
|---|
| Date | 2009 |
|---|
| Pages | 127 - 153 |
|---|
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing Ltd. |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.equinoxpub.com/home/
|
|---|
| Location | Sheffield, UK [謝菲爾德, 英國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | This article is part of a series on the Shorter Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (BZA). Continuing the investigation from previous research on the provenance of the BZA, it is concluded that the attribution of the BZA to the Kā?yapīya school is mistaken. A comparison of the BZA’s ?akra-saṃyukta with the Pāli Sakka-saṃyutta shows that, with minor exceptions, the narrative content of both saṃyuttas is identical though the number of suttas varies. Finally, the article completes the translation of the ?akra-saṃyukta, the first part of which appeared in BSR 25 (2). |
|---|
| ISSN | 02652897 (P); 17479681 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1558/bsrv.v26i2.127 |
|---|
| Hits | 970 |
|---|
| Created date | 2010.02.03 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.07.05 |
|---|
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
