|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
陳英善 (著)=Cheng, Ying-shan (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.8 |
|---|
| Date | 1995.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 373 - 396 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
|---|
| Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | 真空觀; 理事無礙觀; 周徧含容觀; 緣起相由; 法性融通 |
|---|
| Abstract | 研究華嚴宗思想首先面臨的問題，是有關初祖是誰的
問題，由此連帶著相關於華嚴宗思想的重要論著 --《法
界觀門》之作者是誰，也成熱門討論之課題. 經由常盤
大定等人的研究，認為初祖乃杜順，且學界亦大多認為《
法界觀門》乃杜順之作 (詳參見鎌田茂雄《華嚴學研究資
料集成》，頁383 ~ 384，所收集有關這方面文獻).
本文並非解決《法界觀門》作者是誰的論著，而是試
圖以《法界觀門》為引子來論述華嚴宗思想的發展演變，
或許可從華嚴宗思想發展的演變中，讓吾人進一步地了解
《法界觀門》義涵，藉而釐清《法界觀門》作者問題.
藉本文的研究，得知在法藏時有關《法界觀門》
思想已存在，且於法藏的諸論著中有不少篇幅是針對理事
問題來處理，若依《法界觀門》的三觀來看，此有關理事
無礙之論證乃是進入周徧含容觀事事無礙之關鍵，故法藏
以諸多篇幅來闡述之，也因如此，至慧苑時其對華嚴的
了解，導向以法性融通方面來詮釋華嚴，此多少又模糊了
理事與事事間之差別，及圓教與終教的界限，這也是為
什麼至澄觀時對慧苑展開聲討之緣由. 至宗密，雖大體上
是承續著澄觀的看法來解釋《法界觀門》，然已將事事無
礙法界視之為真心本性.
The first problem one may face in studying the
thought of Hua Yen Shcool is who is the first
patriarch. Then，there comes another topic of
heated discussion -- who is the author of Fa
Chieh Kuan Men or The Door of the Visualization of
Dharma Realm，an important essay on the thought of
Hua Yen School. According to 常盤大定 (Ch'ang
P'an Ta Ting) and other researchers, the first
patriarch of Hua Yen School is Tu Shiun (杜順).
Besides, Tu Shiun is considered by most scholars
that he is the author of Fa Chieh Kuan Men.
This paper tries not to clarify who is the
author of Fa Chieh Kuan Men but to describe the
development of the thought of Hua Yen School by
means of Fa Chieh Kuan Men. Perhaps, through the
clarification of the development of the thought of
Hua Yen School，we may understand the content and
the author of Fa Chieh Kuan Men.
This paper finds that the thought of Fa Chieh
Kuan Men already existed in the time of Fa
Tsang. In his essays, Fa Tsang (法藏) devoted a
lot to the treatment of the problem of the li or
noumenon and shih or phenomenon. Judged from the
three visualizations of Fa Chieh Kuan Men，the
justification of the no-obstruction between the
noumenon and the phenomena is the key to the
discussion of the no-obstruction between
phenomenon and phenomenon in the All-pervading
and All-inclusive visualization.Therefore，Fa
Tsang devoted a lot of space to describe it.
Accordingly，when in later time，Hui Yuan (慧苑)
interpreted the Avatamsaka Sutra with the
inter-penetration of Fa Hsion or Phenomena and
Nature，he ignored more or less the difference
between the noumenon-phenomena and the
phenomena-phenomena as well as the boundary of
Yuan Chiao or the Complete Teaching and Tsung
Chiao or Final Teaching. This is also the reason
why Ch'en Kuan (澄觀) attached on Hui Yuan. As to
Tsung Mi (宗密)，in General he continued to
apply the viewpoint of Ch'en Kuan to interpret Fa
Chieh Kuan Men. However，He already regarded the
dharma realm of the non-obstruction between
phenomenon and phenomenon as the True mind and
Original Nature. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 1436 |
|---|
| Created date | 1998.07.22 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.06.16 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
