 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
法顯和玄奘所見外道之比較=Comparison Between Faxian 法顯（337–422）and Xuanzang’s 玄奘（602–664）Observation of Non-Buddhist Traditions |
|
|
|
| Author |
嚴耀中 (著)=Yan, Yao-zhong (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
華林國際佛學學刊=Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.2 n.1 《法顯研究》專刊 |
|---|
| Date | 2019.05 |
|---|
| Pages | 167 - 185 |
|---|
| Publisher | World Scholastic Publishers |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.worldscholastic.com/
|
|---|
| Location | Singapore [新加坡] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位: 北京師範大學。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 法顯=Faxian; 《高僧法顯傳》=Faxian gaoseng zhuan; 玄奘=Xuanzang; 《大唐西域記》=Da Tang Xiyu ji; 外道=Non-Buddhist traditions |
|---|
| Abstract | 法顯與玄奘同樣作為到印度取經之高僧，有著共同的觀察角度，並留下相當豐富的記錄，故可藉此對印度約二個世紀之間的宗教形態之變化做個比較，尤其是對佛教之外的所謂“外道”。這可分三方面來進行：一是外道的組成及內涵之變化；二是與佛教的彼此消長；三是對造成如此狀況之原因做一些解析。作為“餘言”，還可探討一下，法顯和玄奘關於外道的觀察與敘述對中國佛教和中國文化帶來何種影響。
Faxian 法顯 (337–422) and Xuanzang 玄奘 (602–664) were both Buddhist masters who have travelled to India in search of Buddhist scriptures. They shared the same cultural perspective in their observation of India and have left us a substantial record of their observations. Their writing, therefore, could be compared in order to shed light on the changes that Indian religious traditions, especially non-Buddhist traditions, underwent during the two centuries between Faxian and Xuanzang’s journey. Three aspects could be compared: 1. the change in the organization and nature of the non-Buddhist traditions; 2. the rise and fall of the non-Buddhist traditions in relation to Buddhist traditions; 3. the possible causes underlying the changes. I will also discuss how Faxian and Xuanzang’s observations on the non-Buddhist traditions may have influenced Chinese Buddhism and culture. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一 169
二 173
三 179
|
|---|
| ISSN | 27050742 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.6939/HIJBS.201904_2(1).0007 |
|---|
| Hits | 248 |
|---|
| Created date | 2021.03.03 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2021.04.12 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
