 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dialectics of Enlightenment, East and West |
|
|
|
| Author |
Wenning, Mario (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Journal of Chinese Philosophy
|
|---|
| Volume | v.44 n.3-4 |
|---|
| Date | 2017.09-12 |
|---|
| Pages | 251 - 274 |
|---|
| Publisher | International Society for Chinese Philosophy |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://iscp-online1.org/
|
|---|
| Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | Critical theorists have argued that the concept of Enlightenment is paradoxical. While it designates the liberation from superstition through the use of reason, Enlightenment also sets up new forms of superstition. This article focuses on Gan Yang's and Wang Hui's rereading of the dynamic processes of Enlightenment in China and in Europe. It argues for a transcultural perspective on Enlightenment's tendency to give rise to a deformation of reason. Only if the culturally varying forms of reason and unreason in Europe as well as China are being reflected might it be possible to continue pursuing the self-critical project of Enlightenment at a global level. |
|---|
| Table of contents | The three phases of enlightenment in the west 254
Dialectics Of Enlightenment In China 262
Towards a Hybridization of Traditions 266
Endnotes 270 |
|---|
| ISSN | 03018121 (P); 15406253 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 155 |
|---|
| Created date | 2021.11.01 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.12.14 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
