|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storehouse Consciousness and the Unconscious: A Comparative Study of Xuan Zang and Freud on the Subliminal Mind |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Jiang, Tao
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.72 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2004.03 |
|---|
| ページ | 119 - 139 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Oxford University Press |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Oxford, UK [牛津, 英國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 抄録 | The postulation of storehouse consciousness, alayavijnana, is a major theoretical accomplishment of the Yogacara School of Buddhism. It is formulated as a subliminal consciousness to account for our sense of self and the continuity of our experience without resorting to any form of reification, a taboo in Mahayana Buddhism. Its subliminal character has tempted some Buddhist scholars to compare it with the unconscious in modern psychoanalysis. However, alayavijnana was developed in a radically different cultural, historical, and philosophical milieu from the modern notion of the unconscious. Hence, before using the term unconscious to interpret alayavijnana, we should carefully investigate the two concepts and the larger theoretical paradigms within which they are respectively located. Through a comparative study this article addresses several funda- mental differences between them and explores some possible reasons behind such differences by revealing certain basic operative presuppositions embedded in the two formulations of the subliminal consciousness.
|
|---|
| 目次 | INDIVIDUALITY 121
COLLECTIVITY 126
PERSONHOOD: TWO PREMISES, TWO PARADIGMS 133
|
|---|
| ISSN | 00027189 (P); 14774585 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 598 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2005.04.06 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2020.01.10 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
