サイトマップ本館について諮問委員会お問い合わせ資料提供著作権について当サイトの内容を引用するホームページへ        

書目仏学著者データベース当サイト内
検索システム全文コレクションデジタル仏経言語レッスン博物館リンク
 
Bookmark and Share


加えサービス
書誌管理
書き出し
Metalogic in East Asia: Discussion on the Antinomic Reason (*viruddhāvyabhicārin) in P’an piryang non
著者 Moro, Shigeki (著)=師茂樹 (au.)
掲載誌 International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture=국제불교문화사상사학회
巻号v.29 n.2
出版年月日2019.12
ページ69 - 91
出版者International Association for Buddhist Thought and Culture
出版サイト http://iabtc.org/
出版地Seoul, Korea [首爾, 韓國]
資料の種類期刊論文=Journal Article
言語英文=English
ノートMORO Shigeki is a professor at Hanazono University, Kyoto, Japan.
キーワードWŏnhyo; P’an piryang non; hetuvidyā; antinomic reason; viruddhāvyabhicārin
抄録Although the tradition of the East Asian Buddhist logic is a transmission of the system of Indian logic established by Dignāga (ca. 480–540), it developed in its own way in East Asia. East Asian Buddhist logic should be reconsidered in the context of the East Asian Buddhist tradition, instead of based on Western or Indian logic-centrism.
The twelfth section of P’an piryang non written by Wŏnhyo (617–686) metalogically discusses the logical problem of the antinomic reason (*viruddhāvyabhicārin), one of the fallacies of the reason of the three-part syllogism. Some textual problems remain in the section preserved in the manuscript of Otani University. Wŏnhyo seemed to have a keen interest in the antinomic reason. Although Dignāga categorizes the antinomic reason as one of the six fallacies of the inconclusive reasons, it has been questioned whether the categorization is valid by premodern Buddhist logicians and current scholars. Wŏnhyo tried to solve the problem through a kind of reductio ad absurdum method. Thus, he transformed the principle of the antinomic reason and showed the tautological redefinition, which probably is in conflict with the rule of the fallacy of both-agreement. According to these points, Wŏnhyo’s perspective of the antinomic reason seems to resemble the standpoint of Mun’gwe (fl. 7th century) more rather than that of Kuiji (632-682).
These points found in the short descriptions of P’an piryang non probably express the features of Wŏnhyo’s logic and not of his logical misinterpretation. We need an even more detailed examinations of P’an piryang non from the viewpoints of textual criticism and logic.
目次Abstract
Introduction 71
P’an piryang non and the Antinomic Reason 72
Textual Problem 75
Wŏnhyo’s Solution 77
Conclusion 81
References 86
ISSN15987914 (P)
DOI10.16893/IJBTC.2019.06.29.2.69
ヒット数12
作成日2021.03.10
更新日期2021.03.10



Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。

注意:

この先は にアクセスすることになります。このデータベースが提供する全文が有料の場合は、表示することができませんのでご了承ください。

修正のご指摘

下のフォームで修正していただきます。正しい情報を入れた後、下の送信ボタンを押してください。
(管理人がご意見にすぐ対応させていただきます。)

シリアル番号
607348

検索履歴
フィールドコードに関するご説明
検索条件ブラウズ