|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
敦煌 P.3216、P.2483 等卷「阿彌陀讚文」樣貌與應用探究=A Study on Miscellaneous Copies and Applications of “The Eulogy of Amitabha” in Dunhuang Manuscripts P.3216, P.2483 and others |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
林仁昱 (著)=Lin, Jen-yu (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
敦煌學=Studies on Tun-huang
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.34 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018.08 |
|---|
| ページ | 23 - 44 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 南華大學敦煌學研究中心 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://nhdh.nhu.edu.tw/Web/Index
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 嘉義縣, 臺灣 [Chia-i hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| ノート | 作者單位：國立中興大學中文系副教授
Associate Professor of Chinese Department, National Chung Hsing University |
|---|
| キーワード | 阿彌陀讚文=The Eulogy of Amitabha; 淨土讚歌叢抄=The praise song groups of pure land; 敦煌佛教歌曲=The Buddhist songs in Dunhuang manuscripts; 彌陀淨土歌曲=The pure land songs |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本文針對敦煌 P.3216、P.2483 等卷「阿彌陀讚文」的樣貌與應用進行探究。這是淨土「叢抄卷」的特定「讚歌組」研究。這「組」讚歌在「阿彌陀讚文」這樣的總括名稱之下，抄錄在其他文獻的讚歌，如 P.2250 題〈西方十五願讚〉者、《淨土五會念佛略法事儀讚》（略本）題作〈五會讚〉者，但在此只作為全組的段落，未另再標示獨自的名稱；還有以套語冠於句首的段落，如以「彌陀」、「西方」、「淨土」、「三塗」排比數句到數十句者；再加上特定主題內容段落，如讚嘆法照功德者。而這些段落，或許原本就是獨自存在的讚歌，何以被整合在一個讚名之下？又目前學界的分段是否合理？其實際運用的情形，是否正呼應著某個成套的次序？或是有某種慣例於此隱然成形？針對這些問題，本文將從寫卷樣貌、讚歌內容進行探究，並藉以推考出其應用的可能方式、作用與意義。
This article explores the appearance and application of Dunhuang manuscripts P.3216, P.2483 and other volumes of “The Eulogy of Amitabha”. This is the study of the specific “praise song group” of the Amitabha pure land. It combines many eulogy excerpts under the umbrella term “mitabha” including independent eulogy （praise song）n other transcripts, for example “The Eulogy of fifteen wishes for west pure land” in Dunhuang manuscripts P.2250. It also includes opening paragraphs introduced by formulaic phrases such as “Amitabha”, “Western”, “Pure land”, “Three bad ways” and so on that may range from a few to several dozen sentences. Finally it may include paragraphs that are topic-specific, such as an eulogistic praise of the virtuous blessed by the dharma. A summary of the observations of these paragraphs reveals several problems. First of all, each of these were an independent eulogy （praise song）, why were they brought under an umbrella term? Secondly, are the paragraph separations accepted by current scholars reasonable? Third, is the actual application echoinga certain arranged order? Is there a certain subtle convention that had been formed? This article will explore these issues and use them to examine the possible ways, roles, and implications of their application. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一、前言 26
二、P.3216 寫本樣貌與行儀推進方式探究 27
三、P.2483與龍谷大學藏本等卷樣貌與讚歌內容、聯繫關係探究 31
四、「阿彌陀讚文」整體內容與架構的設計 38
五、結語 42
主要參考文獻 44
一、寫本圖錄 44
二、傳統文獻 44
三、近人論著 44 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10159339 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 161 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.05.04 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.05.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
