網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
李通玄의 敎判論=A Study on the Doctrinal Classification of Li Tongxuan(李通玄)
作者 임상희 (著)=Lim, Sang-hee (au.)
出處題名 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
卷期v.11
出版日期2005.08
頁次87 - 111
出版者불교학연구회=佛教學研究會
出版者網址 http://www.kabs.re.kr/
出版地Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言韓文=Korean
關鍵詞이통현=Li Tongxuan; 화엄경=Avataṃsaka-sūtra; 교판=Doctrinal Classification; 십종=十宗=Ten Schools; 십교=十教=The Doctrines; 돈오성불=sudden enlightenment; 철나성불=instantaneous enlightenment
摘要 Whenever we take a look at the thoughts of Chinese Buddhist philosophers, one of the most effective methods to approach their ideas is to understand their doctrinal classifications. Despite much criticism, studying their doctrinal classifications are still the easiest way to comprehend their ideas.
In this paper, I inquire into the doctrinal classification of Li Tongxuan. The third patriarch Hua-yen School, Fa-tsang(法藏) is Li Tongxuan’s contemporary. Li Tongxuan, as a lay Buddhist practioner, he devoted himself to the study of both research and practice of the Avataṃsaka-sūtra. Most of the previous researches insist that Li Tongxuan was influenced by Fa-tsang in the fundamental theory. Apart from Fa-tsang, Li Tongxuan interpreted independently the Avataṃsaka-sūtra in terms of a unique and practical perspective.
Li Tongxuan’s classification consists of Ten Schools(十宗) and Ten Doctrines(十敎). The reason why he classified them this way is that the Avataṃsaka-sūtra has a relatively clear difference from other sutras. He makes his classification, placing emphasis on the distinct character of ‘sudden enlightenment’ in the Avataṃsaka-sūtra. His concern is not the explanation of each doctrine but an independent and subjective approach to enlightenment.
On this standpoint, he defined Ten Schools as ‘sudden enlightenment(頓悟成佛),’ and ‘Ten Doctrines’ as ‘instantaneous enlightenment(刹那成佛).’ Actually, these two are not different but fundamentally all the same. However, for convenience’s sake, I explained it separately.
Li Tongxuan’s classification seems to lack logic and systematic analysis compared to Fa-tsang’s doctrinal classification. Also it lacks objectivity because of his excessive stress on the Avataṃsaka-sūtra. However, his practical standpoint fully corresponds to the teachings of the Avataṃsaka-sūtra.
He strongly emphasizes ‘original Buddhahood(本來成佛)’ through explaining ‘sudden enlightenment’ and ‘instantaneous enlightenment.’ With this theory, he provides us with a clear and distinct way of practice. In conclusion, his practical standpoint exactly reflects the core idea of the Seon School which ultimately seeks enlightenment subjectively.
目次I. 서언 87
II. 기존 교판에 대한 입장 90
III. 十宗十教의 조직 95
1. 十宗분류의 관점 95
2. 十教설정의 근거 101
IV. 결어 108

ISSN15980642 (P)
點閱次數511
建檔日期2021.04.14
更新日期2021.04.16










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
610692

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽