 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contradiction in Buddhist Argumentation |
|
|
|
| 作者 |
Siderits, Mark (著)
|
|---|
| 出處題名 |
Argumentation
|
|---|
| 卷期 | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版日期 | 2008.03 |
|---|
| 頁次 | 125 - 133 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Springer |
|---|
| 出版者網址 |
https://link.springer.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 關鍵詞 | Contradiction; Dialetheism; Nagarjuna; Madhyamaka; Tetralemma; Reduction |
|---|
| 摘要 | Certain Buddhist texts contain statements that are prima facie contradictions. The scholarly consensus has been that such statements are meant to serve a rhetorical function that depends on the apparent contradictions being resolvable. But recently it has been claimed that such statements are meant to be taken literally: their authors assert as true statements that are of the form ‘p and not p’. This claim has ramifications for our understanding of the role played by the principle of non-contradiction in Buddhist argumentation. I argue that these make the claim less plausible. |
|---|
| 目次 | References 133 |
|---|
| ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-007-9073-8 |
|---|
| 點閱次數 | 418 |
|---|
| 建檔日期 | 2008.03.25 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.22 |
|---|
|
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
|
