The purpose of this text is to discuss the issue of the modern philosophical hermeneutics of ' the 'mind' in Buddhism philosophy (i.e. the China philosophy in generally). Today, most of people comprehend it as the subjectivity in regard to the hermeneutics of philosophy. In fact, 'Mind' must bridge the function between the link of Canon and the reflection of the Subjectivity in Buddhism philosophy. Is it really appropriate to let the Subjectivity bridge the function? In term of the text, it is not appropriate to interpret the 'mind' into any meaning of the Subjectivity. In our opinion, we believe it would be much better to follow the way of the phenomenology, to lead the 'mind' upon the conception of the 'speech-subject', and to link the differentiation between the semiotics and semantics. If those can be done, we will have to turn the rules and principles of the subjectivity to the language of metaphor. According to the above-mentioned comprehension, the text uses it as an example the interpretation of Tian-Tai school of Buddhism as it is based on the essence of Fa-Hua Scripture. The core meaning is upon 'Ji', however, it is not appropriate to comprehend the 'Ji' with the progressive way of Subjectivity. It shall be contextualized upon 'Fan Nao Ji Pu Ti' (the affliction itself is the enlightenment) and treated as the metaphor linguistics. That is to say, many metaphors in Fa Hua Scripture are the action of metaphor linguistics of 'Ji'. Therefore, only can we enter the world of teaching of Tian Tai and re-grasp the meaningful world of Fa Hua Scripture by restoring the metaphor of the language.
