|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's Nothing Wrong with Raw Perception: A Response to Chakrabarti's Attack on Nyāya's "Nirvikalpaka Pratyakṣa" |
|
|
|
| Author |
Phillips, Stephen H.
|
|---|
| Source |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| Volume | v.51 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2001.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 104 - 113 |
|---|
| Publisher | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | BUDDHISM; METAPHYSICS; NYAYA; PERCEPTION; PHILOSOPHY |
|---|
| Abstract | As part of its direct realism in the epistemology of perception, classical Indian Nyaya posits indeterminate perception where a qualifier is grasped immediately without being grasped as qualifying its qualificandum, the thing whose property it is. Contemporary philosopher, Arindam Chakrabarti, argued in Philosophy East and West 50, no. 1 (Jan 2000) that Nyaya would best eschew such "indeterminate perception." This paper offers a defense drawing on the classical texts. It is explained in particular that while there is no claim of direct, apperceptive evidence for raw perception, there is an argument that ties up all verbalizable cognition, including verbalizable perception, as having the qualifier it presents as available through previous experience. But with a first-time perception of something as, say, a cow, the cognizer's memory not informed by previous cow experience could not possibly provide the qualifier, cowhood, and the best candidate seems its perception in the raw. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 1542 |
|---|
| Created date | 2005.09.23 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.05.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
