|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
關於Candrakīrti的二諦說中的幾個問題(上)=Several Issues regarding Candrakīrti's Theory of Two Truths (Part I) |
|
|
|
| Author |
釋見弘 (著)=Shih, Jien-hong (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.19 |
|---|
| Date | 2006.07.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 293 - 324 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
|---|
| Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | 作者為中華佛學研究所助理研究員 |
|---|
| Keyword | Candrakīrti; 月稱; 二諦=Two truths; paramārthasatya |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文旨在針對眾多研究Candrakīrti月稱的二諦說（satyadvaya）的論文中，未曾注意到或未曾詳細論究的若干問題點，加以檢討。包括（Ⅰ）Candrakīrti的二諦構造裡，佛以外的聖者們，其認識對象與二諦、特別是「勝義諦」（paramārthasatya）和「唯世俗」（saṃv?timātra）間有何關連？（Ⅱ）二諦彼此是相互矛盾的對立關係、抑或是相輔相成的關係？（Ⅲ）Candrakīrti所主張的世俗諦與自性之關連為何等等問題。本次撰寫的（上）篇主要以第一個問題為焦點。經過比較、評析Candrakīrti的諸著作中的相關文節之後，發現Candrakīrti雖然沒有直接明說諸佛以外的聖者們也能見勝義諦，但他其實是認可這些聖者們同時擁有與勝義有關的認識和與世俗有關的認識。雖然仍殘留若干不明之處，Candrakīrti如此的立場，與唯識學派提出「根本智」及「後得智」之概念的立場，基本上是一致的。
This article considers various issues in Candrakīrti’s theory of two truths which have not been addressed or dealt with in detail by scholars. These include the following: 1. In Candrakīrti’s theory of the two truths, for those who have entered stages of holiness besides the Buddha, what is the relationship between the object of knowledge and the two truths (especially with reference to paramārthasatya and saṃv?timātra)? 2. Are the two truths contradictory or complementary? 3. For Candrakīrti, what is the relationship between conventional truth and self-nature? Part I, the present article, focuses on the first of these issues. After comparing and examining relevant works by Candrakīrti, we find that although Candrakīrti does not explicitly discuss the issue of holy persons other than the Buddha seeing the ultimate truth, he does allow that they have perceptions relating to both ultimate and conventional truths at the same time. Although there remain many ambiguities, Candrakīrti’s conceptualizations are more or less consistent with the Yogācāra concepts of mūlajñāna and p???halabdhajñāna. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 294
二、見「唯世俗」等的聖者能否見勝義諦？ 294
（一）凡聖的認識與二諦的確立 294
（二）見「唯世俗」的菩薩是何地之菩薩？304
（三）聖者間認識的異同 307
（四）小結 315 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 2230 |
|---|
| Created date | 2006.12.08 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.06.20 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
