Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
從漢譯《中論》的對反詞組析探其思維理路=An Analysis of the Reasoning of Antonyms in the Mulamadhyamakakarika
Author 林建德=Lin, Kent Chien-te
Source 臺大佛學研究=Taiwan Journal of Buddhist Studies
Volumen.15
Date2008.06
Pages45 - 84
Publisher國立臺灣大學佛學研究中心=The Center for Buddhist Studies, National Taiwan University
Publisher Url http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~ntucbs/
Location臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language中文=Chinese
Note作者單位:佛教慈濟大學宗教與文化研究所
Keyword八不=Eight Negations; 二諦=Two Levels of Truth; 不二=Non-Duality; 空=Emptiness; 如=Suchness; 立破=Confirmation and Negation
Abstract《中論》的思維方式是個引人注目的課題,本文即以《中論》裡的對反語詞──生滅、常斷、一異、來去、世間涅槃、世俗諦勝義諦等作為討論的線索,探究《中論》如何面對與運作這些概念,來展現其獨特的思維邏輯。本文先以「八不」與「二諦」之對反詞組為例,從「八不」之「破」,以及「二諦」之「立」,來論述《中論》之立破無礙。接著從立、破此兩面,論述《中論》緣起性空的義理下,所開展的相即、相離的兩種思路。再者,論述相即、相離的兩種理路運作,其背後如性、空性之義理的共通處,認為《中論》相即、相離之思路,皆是以遮遣妄見為主,以帶引人走向出世間的解脫。由此可知,《中論》藉由相對二法之思辨,而展示其思維的高度與深度,使人從有限的思考視域中走出,以破迷啟悟、開闊眼界。

The way of reasoning in the Mulamadhyamakakarika is a prominent topic; this essay discusses its distinctive logical reasoning via the oppositional terms such as arising/ceasing, annihilation/permanence, identity/difference, coming/going, worldly truth/noble truth, and samsara/nirvana. First, the two distinct ways of thinking as negation and confirmation in the theory of Eight Negations and Two Levels of Truth are presented. Second, that these two ways of thinking are based upon the Mulamadhyamakakarikas’s theory of pratitya- samutpada and wunyata are discussed. Third, these two kinds of thinking are shown to be relevant to the thought of Emptiness and Suchness and are actually equal to each other. Fourth, these two ways of thinking both aim to examine the oppositional sides to get beyond all duality to realize Nirvana. In sum, Mulamadhyamakakarika propounds Buddhist philosophical systems of Non-Duality and the Middle Way to pursue liberation through eradicating attachments to all dualistic thinking.
Table of contents一、前言 49
二、對反語詞初步界定 49
(一)漢譯佛典中對應於對反語詞的詞彙 50
(二)《中論》裡的對反語詞 53
三、《中論》「八不」重戲論之遮破 55
(一)以「八不」滅諸戲論 56
(二)「八不」形式上近於「四句」的第四句 58
(三)「八不」不落入「四句」中 61
四、《中論》「二諦」重說法之安立 63
五、對反相離和相即的兩種思路 66
(一)對反兩邊之相離 67
(二)對反兩邊之相即 68
(三)以《心經》之「空」證成《中論》相即相離的思路 70
六、相離相即義理間的共通性 73
七、相即相離皆以遮遣為主 78
八、結論 81
ISSN10271112 (P)
Hits3907
Created date2008.09.09
Modified date2017.07.04



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
166223

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse