|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《金剛經》的「即非」之辯 -- 日本學界對「即非論理」的論考與爭議=The Inspiration of Japanese Debate/Discussion of "The Logic of Immediate Negation" in Vajraccheika-Prajbaparamita-Sutra to Chinese Buddhist Researchers |
|
|
|
| Author |
郭瓊瑤 (著)=Kuo, Chiung-yao (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
世界宗教學刊=Journal of World Religions
|
|---|
| Volume | n.11 |
|---|
| Date | 2008.06.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 103 - 149 |
|---|
| Publisher | 南華大學宗教學研究所 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://rel3.nhu.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 嘉義縣, 臺灣 [Chia-i hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者屬於南華大學外文系 |
|---|
| Keyword | 金剛經=Diamond Sutra; 金剛般若經=Vajraccheika-prajbaparamita-sutra; 即非論理=paradoxical phrases |
|---|
| Abstract | 「如來說A，即非A，是名A」──《金剛經》這種看似詭辯的命題，鈴木大拙名之為「即非論理」(1944年)，認為它是特殊的東洋論理，為一超越論理的論理，並且結合禪學加以闡揚，在日本佛教學界蔚為風潮。只是，五十年後，日本學界對此說法重新提出不同的看法。1991年，谷口富士夫首先提出對鈴木學說的批評，但接著立川武藏、末木文美士、竹橋太、定方晟等學者也紛紛表示自己的看法；所發表的論文就收錄於阿部慈園在1999年編集的《金剛般若経の思想的研究》當中。這些文章全都直接就《金剛經》的「即非論理」來詮解，雖然學者之間有彼此的批評與爭議，但正可見出其多向度的思考。筆者以為將這些論考介紹給華文佛教界，可以激發大家對《金剛經》作更多層面的理解與思索。
The proposition, "'A is not not-A, but is named A,' said Tathagatha," is a paradixical phrase. D.T. Suzuki names it "the logic of immediate negation"(1994). He states that it is a kind of special logic in Eat Asia, which means the logic of trans-logic at the meantime. He interprets it as being united with the Zen Buddhism, which has become a famous doctrine in Japan. However, in the five decades since D.T. Suzuki, the Buddhist studies in Japan have reinterpreted the doctrine. H. Taniguchi first criticized Suzuki's opinion in 1991. Then, M.Tachikawa, H.Sueki, Takehashi F, A.Sadakata and others have expressed their ideas one after the other. They sometimes even argued with each other. The arguments, in fact, reflect their diversified thinking. All these discussions are collected in The Ideological Study on Diamond Sutra, edited by Jion Abe in 1999. I think we can understand more about "A is not not-A, but is named A" by studying the discussions these scholars have engaged in. As such, the purpose of this paper is to introduce these Japanese discussions to Chinese Buddhist researchers.
|
|---|
| Table of contents | 壹 前言 104
貳 日本佛教學界歷來對「即非論理」的論考及爭議議題 106
參 華文佛教圈對「佛說般若波羅蜜，即非般若波羅蜜，是名般若波羅蜜」的註解或解說 126
肆 結語 129
參考文獻 147
|
|---|
| ISSN | 1728645X (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 1327 |
|---|
| Created date | 2009.10.16 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.11.07 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
