 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
楊白衣
|
|---|
| Source |
華岡佛學學報=Hwakang Buddhist Journal
|
|---|
| Volume | n.7 |
|---|
| Date | 1984.09 |
|---|
| Pages | 113 - 134 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華學術院佛學研究所 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為本所研究員 |
|---|
| Keyword | 道倫; 倫記; 瑜伽師地論記; 唐代; 唯識學; 圓測 |
|---|
| Abstract | 道倫的「倫記」為現存最完善的《瑜伽師地論》註疏.
在金藏未被發現以前，學者皆以大正藏本或卍續藏本作為研
究之參考. 但那裏知道這二種刊本竟是錯誤百出，誤傳了唐
代諸家之原意. 本文是拙著《圓測之研究》之副產品，故只
以圓測為例，指出其重大的謬誤處.《倫記》的刊本，現共
有四種，這四種刊本不但分卷方法不同，其文字亦有不少出
入. 本論文為便利學者研究起見，特將分卷方法列出，以資
查考.
Tao Lun's Commentary on the `Yogacarya-bhumi-
sastra` is the most complete commentary extant on
the `sastra`. Before the discovery of the Chin
Tripitaka, all scholars based their research of the
`sastra` on the Taisho Tripitaka Version or the
Sequel Tripitaka Version，not knowing that the two
versions contain many mistakes which distort the
original ideas of the masters in T'ang Dynasty. This
paper is a by-product of another one by the same
author，"A Study on Yuan-ts'e." Here Yuan-ts'e is
taken as an example of those schorals who have made
grave mistakes. There are four versions of Tao Lun's
Commentary available now. They are divided into
volumes in differents ways, and have quite a few
different uses of words. The various ways of
volume-cutting are particularly listed to facilitate
scholars' research. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、序言 114
二、倫記之刊本 116
倫記與論文之對照表 117
三、文句之異同 124
四、結論 131
|
|---|
| Hits | 1223 |
|---|
| Created date | 1998.07.22
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.08.22 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
