|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Belated Response to Hu Shih and D. T. Suzuki |
|
|
|
| Author |
Sellmann, James D.
|
|---|
| Source |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| Volume | v.45 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 1995.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 97 - 104 |
|---|
| Publisher | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | 320; Debate on Ch'an and Zen Buddhism in Philosophy East and West, vol. 3, pp. 3 and 25, April 1953.
|
|---|
| Keyword | Criticism and Interpretation of Hu Shih; Criticism and Interpretation of D. T. Suzuki; 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 中國佛教=Chinese Buddhism |
|---|
| Abstract | The 1953 debate between Hu Shih and D.T. Suzuki is confused because they use the terms Ch'an or Zen to mean different things, so that neither ever actually engages with the other's position. Hu uses Ch'an to denote the historical Buddhist sect in China, whereas Suzuki uses Zen mostly to denote the experience of Zen rather than the historical school. Both Hu and Suzuki misrepresent Zen in discussing its rationality，because it is better described as alogical，rather than either logical or illogical. The debate illustrates the paradoxical nature of experience as both temporal and atemporal. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.2307/1399511 |
|---|
| Hits | 1365 |
|---|
| Created date | 2000.11.08; 2002.03.23
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.05.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
