Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
宗密之援易說佛及其易學圓相圖式述考=A Critical Study of Zongmi's Use of the Yijing in the Explanation of Buddhism
Author 王仲堯 (著)=Wang, Zhong-yao (au.)
Source 中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
Volumen.16
Date2003.09
Pages263 - 287
Publisher中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies
Publisher Url http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
Location新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language中文=Chinese; 英文=English
Note作者為杭州商學院宗教研究所所長=Director, Institute of Religious Research, Hangzhou University of Commerce
Keyword宗密=Zongmi; 佛教=Buddhism; 周易=Yijing; 周易參同契=Zhouyi cantong qi; 圓相圖式=circle dialgram; 歷史價值=historical value
Abstract宗密的佛教思想是對隋唐宗派佛教思想的階段性總結,在禪宗興起的歷史關頭具開創性意義,並深刻揭示了隋唐以來儒道釋三教由分流而終於合一的中國文化大勢,後還對宋代理學思潮及宋明以後禪學的發展發生了根本影響. 宗密佛教思想體系中的援易說佛內容是其特色之一. 援易說佛非自宗密始,但宗密與前人相比具自己的重要特色. 本文從宗密的援易說佛思想結構嚴謹,創造以易學[圓相] 解說佛教教理的方法論理路,並從[宗密援用易學圓相圖式詮說佛教的方法及引出的問題],[坎離匡廓圖],[月體圓相圖]及[阿賴耶識圓相雙十重結構圖]四個方面展開具體討論,指出其易學圓相圖式主取自《周易參同圖》.
本文最後部分對宗密易,佛會通思想的歷史價值進行評價. 首先是比較了宗密與李通玄的易,佛會通思想,討論了宗密與李通玄二家在方法論方面的差別. 其次作者指出宗密援用易學圓相圖式詮說佛教無論在思想方法還是在表現形式上,都給予宋明理學及佛教界以巨大啟發,以致於極深地影響了中國文化儒道佛三家生存和發展的總體格局.

Zongmi's Buddhist thought is a historical summary of the Buddhist schools of thought in the Sui and Tang Dynasties. It is part of the historical trend beginning in the Tang in which the three separate teachings of Confucianism,Taoism and Buddhism were brought together. His thought also had a fundamental influence on Song Neo- Confucianism and the development of Chan in the Song,Ming,and subsequent dynasties. The use of the Yijing to interpret Buddhism is one of the characteristics of his thought. Although Zongmi is not the first person to use the Yijing to explain Buddhism,his thought had unique qualities not found in his predecessors. This paper begins with a discussion of the relationship between Zongmi's Buddhist category of ontology and the theory of the "great Yi" (taiyi 太易) from the Han Dynasty,then discusses the manner in which Zongmi explains Buddhist thought with the Yijing. It then illustrates the precision with which he does this:Zongmi creates the methodological approach of using images of circles (yuanxiang圓相) ,found in the Yijing tradition,to explain Buddhist teachings. This paper specifically discusses this in four aspects:1. Zongmi's method of using circle diagrams from the Yijing tradition and the questions elicited therefrom; 2. the image of Kanli's diagram (坎離匡廓圖); 3. circle diagrams of moon phases (月體圓相圖); 4. alayavijn ana's tenfold circle diagram (阿賴耶識圓相十重圖). The above discussion indicates that Zongmi's application of the circle diagrams from the Yijing tradition was taken from an ancient Chinese text,the Zhouyi cantong qi周易參同契.
The last part of this paper assesses the historical value of Zongmi's integration of the Yijing tradition and Buddhism. First,Zongmi's concept of this integration is compared with that of Li Tongxuan,followed by a discussion of the methodological differences between them. Second,the author points out that Zongm’s use of circle diagrams from the Yijing tradition to interpret Buddhism—both in terms of methodology and manner of expression—greatly informed Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism as well as Buddhism. This deeply influenced the entire Chinese cultural trend of the existence and development of Confucianism,Taoism and Buddhism.
Table of contents一、宗密援易說佛的思想特徵 265
二、宗密援易說佛思想內容中應用的易圖圓相及結構圖式 269
1.宗密援用易學圓相圖式詮說佛教的方法及引出的問題
2.坎離匡廓圖
3.月體圓相圖
4.阿賴耶識圓相雙十重結構圖
三、關於宗密援用易學圓相圖式的若干考述 278
1.易學背景
2.關於宗密是否創造用易圖說佛方法的問題
四、對宗密易、佛會通思想之評價 282
1.宗密與李通玄易、佛會通思想之比較
2.宗密援易說佛思想之歷史價值


ISSN10177132 (P)
Hits1471
Created date2003.09.08
Modified date2017.06.20



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
354563

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse