|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《楞嚴經》真偽考辨=Analysis on Authenticity of Surangama-Samadhi-Sutra |
|
|
|
| Author |
龍延 (著)=Long, Yan (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
古籍整理研究學刊=Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.3 |
|---|
| Date | 2003.05 |
|---|
| Pages | 43 - 46 |
|---|
| Publisher | 東北師範大學古籍整理硏究所 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://gjzlxk.nenu.edu.cn 或 www.gjzlxk.cn
|
|---|
| Location | 長春, 中國 [Changchun, China] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為文學博士，煙台師範學院中文系副教授，主要從事古典文學與佛學研究。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 語言=Language; 文化制度=Cultural-system; 楞嚴經=Surangama-samadhi-sutra; 真偽=Authenticity |
|---|
| Abstract | 《楞嚴經》是中國佛教史上，極重要的一部佛典，但對其真偽一直聚訟紛紜。認為其為偽作最有力者，有日本佛學研究者望月信亨與中國的呂澄，從目錄版本到作者譯者的生平身世，以及佛教義理，行文風格等，指出種種可疑處。本文從語言文化的角度，提供進一步的證據。
Surangama-samadhi-sutra is one of this important Buddhism works in China. But there are a lot of argument about its genuine. Mochizuki Shinko, the Japanese shcolar, and Lv-cheng, the Chinese scholar, recognized it is false by researching its author, translator, catabolism, Buddhism doxy and style. This paper will offer further evidence from the sight of language and culture.
|
|---|
| ISSN | 10091017 (P); 10091017 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 464 |
|---|
| Created date | 2004.05.28
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.08.27 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
