 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Expression “The Myriad Dharmas are Only Consciousness” in Early 20th Century Chinese Buddhism=二十世紀初期中國佛教對萬法唯識之表述 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Hammerstrom, Erik J.
|
|---|
| Source |
Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=中華佛學學報
|
|---|
| Volume | n.23 |
|---|
| Date | 2010.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 71 - 92 |
|---|
| Publisher | Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies=中華佛學研究所 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/ch_html/index_ch00.html
|
|---|
| Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
|---|
| Keyword | Consciousness-Only=唯識; Philosophy=哲學; Science=科學; Taixu=太虛; Wang Xiaoxu=王小徐 |
|---|
| Abstract | This article offers a preliminary examination of the ways in which Consciousness-Only thought was adapted to modern intellectual discourses in China from the 1910s to the 1940s. It begins by tracing the canonical origins of the phrase “the three realms are only mind, the myriad dharmas are only consciousness (sanjie wei xin, wanfa wei shi 三界唯心，萬法唯識).” It then looks at several examples of how this expression was used by Buddhist writers in the early 20th century. It is argued that Buddhists chose to use the doctrine of Consciousness-Only (weishi) as a Buddhist ontology in contradistinction to the idealism (weixin) and materialism (weiwu) of philosophy.
此篇文章初步檢視在1910到1940年唯識思想如何為中國現代知識份子所講述。從回溯經典所說的「三界唯心，萬法唯識」開始，由不同的例子著手看待此思想如何為二十世紀早期的佛教論述家所運用；此處要表明的是相對於唯心及唯物思想，佛教徒選擇唯識之教義作為佛教的本體論。 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
|---|
| Categories | 佛教-思想 |
|---|
| Dynasty | 民國 |
|---|
| Regions | 中國 |
|---|
| Hits | 1639 |
|---|
| Created date | 2011.04.24 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2018.03.01 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
