|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
佛學與科學對話的不同立場=Different Standpoints in the Dialog between Buddhism and Science |
|
|
|
| Author |
傅曉 (著)=Fu, Xiao (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
佛學與科學=Buddhism and Science
|
|---|
| Volume | v.12 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2011.02.01 |
|---|
| Pages | 20 - 32 |
|---|
| Publisher | 圓覺文教基金會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.obf.org.tw
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 佛學=Buddhism; 科學=science; 立場=standpoint; 對話=dialog; 交叉學科研究=interdisciplinary research |
|---|
| Abstract | 基於在佛學與科學對話中，學者對佛教教義的基本態度甚為重要的事實，本文對不同類型的比較研究（如天文學與佛學，心理學與佛學等等）的研究立場進行了分析、分類與討論。本文的結論認為，不同程度但非僵化地接受佛教教義，與相應的科學結論進行對話及整合，且不作價值或意識形態的比較或聲稱（如孰高孰低），將是甚為有利於在學術界進行佛學與科學比較研究的立場。具體專業學科與佛學間的比較研究，相對於整體上的佛學與科學對話應是值得學者努力的主流方向。平等、謙虛、開放的態度是最有益於交叉學科研究的基本態度。
Based on the fact that the basic attitude towards Buddhist doctrine during the dialog be tween Buddhism and Science is quit eessential, this essay analyzed the standpoints of different kinds of comparative research (such as between astronomy and Buddhism, psychology and Buddhism, etc.),and then made a finer-grained analysis and classification. It turns out that the most suitable standpoint of this kind of interdisciplinary research in the academic field would be accepting Buddhist doctrine in some degree and not rigidly, conduct ing dialog and integration with corresponding scientific results, and not car rying out any comparison in value or ideological announcement (such as which one is superior to the other one). The comparative research between relevant scientific areas and Buddhism in contrast to the dialog of Buddhism and science on the whole would be the mains t ream which deserves pursuit by scholars. The basic attitude of being equal , modest and openminded
shall do the most good to this interdisciplinary field. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 20
二、研究動機 22
三、具體某個自然科學學科與佛學相關理論的比較研究 23
四、結語 29
五、誌謝 31
參考書目 31
|
|---|
| ISSN | 16072952 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 1149 |
|---|
| Created date | 2011.04.29 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.07.24 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
