|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《四分律》知而妄語戒內涵及其法理分析--現代法律體系參照下的對比研究=The Content and Jurisprudential Analysis of the Precept Against Deliberately False Speech in Dharmagupta-vinaya :A Comparative Study Referencing the Modern Legal System |
|
|
|
| Author |
陳弘學 (著)=Chen, Hung-Hsueh (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
|---|
| Volume | n.71 |
|---|
| Date | 2014.12.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 39 - 80 |
|---|
| Publisher | 正觀雜誌社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為成功大學中文系 |
|---|
| Keyword | 律部=the vinaya; 妄語=false speech; 戒律學=the study of vinaya; 四分律=Dharmagupta-vinaya; 佛教法理學=jurisprudence of Buddhism |
|---|
| Abstract | 對比分析乃是現代學術操作的重要方法，一則容易凸顯研究主題之特色，二者也正顯示研究客體蘊含超越性價值，因而具備
對比互詮的可能。本文以《四分律》「知而妄語戒」為解析案例，形式上將律文分解為五，包括：一、總敘制戒因緣。二、比丘
聞過舉發。三、佛陀聚眾結戒。四、詳述衍生規定。五、明訂不犯事由。以此五段內容為基礎，通過現代法律體系操作概念，
深入探討「知而妄語戒」構成要件及其種種衍生法理問題，包括將佛教戒律歸入「成文法」一系、並依犯罪論將戒律判為「二
階段犯罪（犯戒）體系」等。期能通過此種對比互詮方式，發明《律》典理性精神與另一種研究的可能向度。
Comparative analysis is an important academic approach nowadays, for it more readily reveals the characteristics of the subject and also presents the transcendental value of the object,thus providing the possibility of reciprocal comparison and explanation. This study examines the case of “the precept against deliberately false speech” in Dharmagupta-vinaya, breaking it down into five steps: 1. a general introduction to how the precept was framed; 2. bhikkhus hearing the expositions; 3. the Buddha gathering the crowd and framing the precept; 4. detailing the derivative rules; and 5. stipulating the regulation. Accordingly, applying the concepts and operations of the modern legal system to carry out analysis on the elements and derivative jurisprudential issues of “the precept against deliberately false speech”, such as including vinaya in “statutory law” and determining the vinaya to be a “two-stage violation system” according to crime theory, etc. It is expected that the rational spirit of the vinaya and other possible research perspectives could be found through reciprocal comparison and explanation. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 40
二、「知而妄語戒」之結戒程序 42
（一）律文結構分析 43
1、總敘制戒因緣
2、比丘聞過舉發
3、佛陀聚眾結戒
4、詳述衍生規定
5、明訂不犯事由
三、「知而妄語戒」之構成要件分析 53
（一）客觀構成要件 53
1、行為主體
2、行為客體
3、行為手段
4、行為結果
（二）主觀構成要件 56
1、行為人之故意意思
2、行為人之認識能力
四、「知而妄語戒」之「罪」與「罰」 58
五、本戒相關法理問題考察 62
（一）「成文法」或「不成文法」之屬性定位 63
1、成文法說
2、不成文法說
3、本文觀點：戒律應屬成文法說
（二）「二階段」或「三階段」之犯戒論體系判定 67
1、刑法之三階段犯罪論體系
2、戒律成犯階段審查
（1）構成要件該當性
（2）違法性
（3）有責性
甲、相對減責：因身分
乙、絕對免責一：因身心狀況
丙、絕對免責二：溯及既往禁止
3、戒律違犯階段判定
六、結論 74
引用書目 77 |
|---|
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 596 |
|---|
| Created date | 2015.05.27 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.09.07 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
