|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Nāgārjuna’s Ontological and Semantic Paradox |
|
|
|
| Author |
Tanaka, Koji
|
|---|
| Source |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| Volume | v.66 n.4 |
|---|
| Date | 2016.10 |
|---|
| Pages | 1292 - 1306 |
|---|
| Publisher | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | Garfield and Priest have rationally reconstructed Nāgārjuna’s doctrine of emptiness as an endorsement of the contradictory nature of reality. According to them, Nāgārjuna can be seen to argue that the way in which things exist in reality and what we can truly say about them must be contradictory. What would be the reasons for thinking that Nāgārjuna would accept their radical interpretation? In raising this question, the main concern is not with how their interpretation coheres with Nāgārjuna’s texts but with the internal coherence (or consistency) within their interpretation. By identifying the incoherence within the resources that Garfield and Priest themselves find in Nāgārjuna, their interpretation will be rejected. |
|---|
| Table of contents | Introduction 1292
Semantic and Ontological Paradox 1294
Is Emptiness Contradictory? 1296
Truth-Makers 1298
The Deflationary Semantic Account 1300
Conclusion 1302
Notes 1302 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2016.0092 |
|---|
| Hits | 231 |
|---|
| Created date | 2016.10.24 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.05.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
