|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
佛教對初期耆那教業論的批判 —— 從漢譯佛典看=Buddhist Critique on Karmic Theory in Early Jainism: From the perspective of Chinese Buddhist Translations |
|
|
|
| Author |
屈大成 (著)=Wut, Tai-shing (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
|---|
| Volume | n.79 |
|---|
| Date | 2016.12.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 173 - 201 |
|---|
| Publisher | 正觀雜誌社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者為香港城市大學中文及歷史學系副教授 |
|---|
| Keyword | Buddhism=佛教; Jainism=耆那教; karma=業; sramana=沙門; asceticism=苦行 |
|---|
| Abstract | 約於公元前6世紀史，印度東北部有沙門思潮興起，抗衡婆羅門教，代表著印度宗教文明踏進新階段，其中以耆那教和佛教最為著名，流傳至今。在漢譯《阿含經》等早期佛典，頗詳細地記載了佛陀跟耆那教人有關業報的論辯，這既是有關耆那教的寶貴漢文資料，也反映出兩教的教義和修行方式的重大分歧。本文依據漢譯早期佛典，析述佛教對耆那教業論批評，希望藉著對比，加深對這兩教以及是時沙門思潮相互競爭的認識，從而對佛教以外的古印度思想有更多了解。
Starting from 6th Century B.C., a tide of Sramanic movements raised against the Brahmin religions in the Northeast part of India, signifying that Indian religion and civilization had stepped into a new stage. Among these movements, Jainism and Buddhism are two of the most famous and still circulate in the world today. In the Chinese translation of early Buddhist Canon such as The Four Agamas, details of debates between Buddha and Jainas on karmic theories are recorded. These materials on Jainism in Chinese language are precious and they demonstrated the differences between the two religions in their doctrines and practices. This paper will demonstrate the Buddhist critique on the karmic theory in Jainism by exploring the Chinese Buddhist translations. This comparison may deepen our understanding on both the two religions and the competition between different Sramanic movements at that time, and shed lights on different ancient Indian thoughts besides Buddhism. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 甲、沙門思潮的興起和性質 174
乙、耆那教的成立及教典 177
丙、耆那教教義大概 181
丁、佛教對耆那教業論的批評 184
1.對命我的批評 185
2.對身業為重的批評 186
3.對宿業決定論的批評 188
(1)今世遭遇的緣由不一 188
(2)宿業說令人作惡業 188
(3)宿業說會引生不能接受的結果 189
4.對苦行的批評 190
(1)無效用 190
(2)不能根治煩惱 190
(3)樂不必因苦得 191
(4)苦行無必要 192
5.對尼乾智慧的批評 193
戊、結語 195
參考書目 197
|
|---|
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 515 |
|---|
| Created date | 2017.01.18 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.09.07 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
