|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
郭瓊瑤 (著)=Kuo, Chiung-yao (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
|---|
| Volume | n.80 |
|---|
| Date | 2017.03.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 5 - 61 |
|---|
| Publisher | 正觀雜誌社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 自性=svabhāva; 無自性=nihsvabhāva; 佛性=buddha-nature; 楞伽經=Lankāvatāra-sūtra; 自內聖智=pratyātmagati-; pratyātmagatigocara |
|---|
| Abstract | 「自性」（通常為梵語svabhāva的譯語）在佛教哲學中兼有正面與負面的意義。對「自性」採正面或負面意義的解釋也成為佛教哲學的根本問題之一。《般若經》、《中論》中言及的「自性」大多指稱負面的、應予否定的對象。但不知從何時起，「自性」轉為正面的、肯定的存在。尤其在如來藏思想的相關典籍中，更將「自性」與「佛性」劃上等號。
後世，甚至在如來藏思想以外的典籍中，也看得到正面意義的「自性」解釋。比如，七世紀的月稱在《淨明句論》－－《中論》的詮釋書－－裏，把「法性」、「本性」、「空性」、「自性」、以及「無自性性」都視為同義詞。
雖然到目前的研究為止，仍舊不清楚到底在哪個時間點，自性的意義產生這樣相反的詮釋。但本文想指出約五世紀左右的《楞伽經》，其實已出現兼具正反兩種意義的「自性」，而這也正是《楞伽經》特有的風格－－將看似矛盾的概念融而為一，即所謂的「自內聖智」（或「自內聖智境界」）。
The svabhāva（self-nature） has positive and negative both meanings in Buddhist philosophy. However the interpretation of svabhāva taken a positive or negative meaning has become one of the fundamental problems of Buddhist texts. Which the svabhāva in Mahāprajñāpāramitā Sūtra and Mūlamadhyamaka-kārikā all were taken negative meaning. But after then, the svabhāva was transferred to positive meaning, even was equal to buddha-nature in the Tathāgatagarbha texts.
Hereafter, except the Tathāgatagarbha texts, svabhāva also has been explained positive meaning in other texts. For example, the Mūlamadhyamaka-vṛtti-prasannapadā, which was worte Candrakīrti（A.D.600-650） discripted that the nature of things（dharma）、nature（prakṛti）、emptiness（śūnyatā）、self（svabhāva）、and non-self-nature（nihsvabhāva） all are synonyms actually.
Until now, we don't know when the meaning of self-nature has been changed. But on this article, I will indicate Lankāvatāra-sūtra（about 4-5 centuries, the rest omitted as LAS） has actually appeared both positive and negative meanings on self-nature. Anyway, that is exactly the unique style of LAS, which the two concepts of contradiction will be to one, and named as the pratyātmagati-（means subjective wisdom）, or pratyātmagatigocara（means objective things）. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言：「自性」的意義轉變 8
自性、自我與法 9
無我、空、無自性的思潮興起 10
中、後期大乘佛教中的自性思想 11
《楞伽經》中「自性」正、負面意義之同一性 12
二、《楞伽經》中，自性的正、負面意義 13
(一)正面意義的自性 16
(二)負面意義的自性 22
(三)同一文節中，正面、負面意義兼具的自性 36
(四)不具正、負面意義的自性 45
三、結論 52
參考文獻 55 |
|---|
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 499 |
|---|
| Created date | 2017.04.24 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.10.31 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
