|
|
|
|
|
|
Debatable Truths: What Buddhist Argumentation Reveals about Critical Thinking |
|
|
|
Author |
Lugli, Ligeia
|
Source |
Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal
|
Volume | v.16 n.2 |
Date | 2015 |
Pages | 371 - 400 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Publisher Url |
https://www.routledge.com/
|
Location | Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Note | Special Section |
Table of contents | 1. Introduction 371 2. Critical thinking: An overview 373 3. Critical thinking and Asian students 378 4. Buddhist argumentation and critical thinking 381 4a. Buddhist argumentation: A quick overview 381 4b. Cogency and justificatory reasoning 383 4c. Justificatory reasoning and the dispositional model of critical thinking 387 4d. Epistemic framework 389 5. Conclusions: Towards a practical definition of academic critical thinking 392 Disclosure statement 393 |
ISSN | 14639947 (P); 14767953 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2015.1026150 |
Hits | 49 |
Created date | 2019.01.16 |
Modified date | 2019.01.18 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|