Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
Debatable Truths: What Buddhist Argumentation Reveals about Critical Thinking
Author Lugli, Ligeia
Source Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Volumev.16 n.2
Date2015
Pages371 - 400
PublisherRoutledge
Publisher Url https://www.routledge.com/
LocationAbingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
NoteSpecial Section
Table of contents1. Introduction 371
2. Critical thinking: An overview 373
3. Critical thinking and Asian students 378
4. Buddhist argumentation and critical thinking 381
4a. Buddhist argumentation: A quick overview 381
4b. Cogency and justificatory reasoning 383
4c. Justificatory reasoning and the dispositional model of critical thinking 387
4d. Epistemic framework 389
5. Conclusions: Towards a practical definition of academic critical thinking 392
Disclosure statement 393
ISSN14639947 (P); 14767953 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2015.1026150
Hits49
Created date2019.01.16
Modified date2019.01.18



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
580661

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse