|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
佛壇後壁背面觀音造像研究 —從「施食」的觀點切入=Explaining the Beizuo Guanyin Behind the Back Wall of Buddhist Alter —A Food Bestowing Ritual Perspective |
|
|
|
| Author |
陳明華 (著)=Chen, Ming-hua (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
臺大佛學研究=Taiwan Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.36 |
|---|
| Date | 2018.12 |
|---|
| Pages | 99 - 156 |
|---|
| Publisher | 國立臺灣大學佛學研究中心=The Center for Buddhist Studies, National Taiwan University |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~ntucbs/
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者係韓國弘益大學造形設計學院助教授。 |
|---|
| Keyword | 觀音=Guanyin; 施食=Buddhist food-bestowing ritual; 焰口=yankou; 水陸=Water & Land Fasting Ritual; 羅漢=Arhat |
|---|
| Abstract | 漢傳佛寺主殿佛壇背壁常見塑有一堂「背坐觀音」像，韓國寺院亦見此種營造法式。有關此造像所表宗教意涵或儀式職能，尚未見深入探討。本文以朝鮮後期佛壇背壁觀音圖調查資料為基礎，與明清時期造像進行比對研究。對於現存宋初迄明清所塑背坐觀音造像的緣起，推測應與密教施食、天台宗《請觀世音懺法》持誦陀羅尼的行道，以及彌陀淨土信仰的盛行有密切關連。朝鮮半島現遺十五世紀以後的佛壇背壁觀音圖，亦是受此影響修繪。
從兩地佛壇背壁所出現的白衣觀音、普陀觀音、毘盧觀音形象，可知宋以後在淨土法門中，觀音因其所扮演救度地獄亡者突出的角色，成為影響觀音形象變化的原因。如其中毘盧觀音所表為毘盧遮那佛，來自施食儀軌「入觀音定」作法中，主法者透過觀想與觀音同體，觀音與佛同身的意義。教理背景與華嚴宗主張觀音與毘盧遮那佛無異的義學，亦不無關係。毘盧觀音的出現，顯現觀音在施食儀法中所具有的崇高地位。另明清佛壇背壁造像中極為突出的羅漢群像，所表為無數在山中入定禪觀的聲聞緣覺聖賢眾。觀音配祀羅漢像的形成，應與焰口或水陸齋中並行施食和齋僧的儀軌特性有關。朝鮮佛壇背壁不繪羅漢圖像，則與其請羅漢儀式及配置羅漢像空間的變化有關。
Sculptures of the Beizuo Guanyin are commonly found at the back wall of Buddhist alter in the Chinese Buddhism temples, which are also found in Korean temples as a ritualistic design. Up to now, their religious meaning and ritualistic purposes have not yet studied.This paper seeks to make a comparative analysis of the two, based on the studies of the Korean Beizuo Guanyin sculptures on the back walls of Buddhist alters during the Late Joseon period and its comparisons with its Chinese counterparts during the Ming and Qing Dynasties period.
The extant early-Song Dynasty sculptures was probably originated from the “Avalokitêśvara Repentant Ritual”(qing guanshiyin chanfa) of the Tiantai tradition. But with the propagation of Pure Land tradition and the “Burning-Mouth Hungry Ghost Ritual” during Ming and Qing Dynasties, it was found that the Beizuo Guanyin sculptures are closely related to the Pure Land Buddhist beliefs. The extant post-15th century Late Joseon Beizuo Guanyin sculptures are also intimately tied to the demand of the Pure Land Buddhist beliefs. This implies that the role of the savior of the Naraka spirits, which the Guanyin Bodhisattva takes after the Song Dynasty, is the main prototype inducing the change in its image.Also taken into account is the appearance Vairocana Bodhisattva in the Food-bestowing Ritual of the same era, which is due to fact that the Dorje Guru merges with the Guanyin through visualization methods in the “Ru Guanyin Ding” of the Food-bestowing Ritual,and also that the belief of Huayan tradition that the Guanyin is no different from the Vairocana Buddha.
The appearance of the Vairocana Bodhisattva manifests a growing importance of the role of Bodhisattvas in Food-bestowing rituals. One characteristic of the Beizuo Guanyin sculptures of Buddhist alter during the Ming and Qing Dynasties is the numerous Arhats representing the numerous Pratyekabuddhayāna entering the Samādhi meditation contemplation on the mountains. The combination of Ganyin and Arhat sculptures likely relates to the characteristic of the Buring-mouth ritual or the Water & Land Fasting Ritual in which both food-bestowing alms-giving are simultaneously performed. The omission of Arhats in the back walls of Buddhist alters during the Late Joseon is related to the Arhat rituals and the adjustments made to the Arhat Sculpture zone.
|
|---|
| Table of contents | 壹、引言 101
貳、觀音施食由來與經軌 102
參、明清時期中朝佛壇背壁觀音塑像異同 109
一、所在佛殿與佛壇安像形式 113
二、觀音與脇侍人物 115
肆、施食壇法中的觀音形象 119
一、補陀洛迦山觀音像 121
二、施甘露水白衣觀音像 122
三、毘盧觀音像 125
伍、觀音配祀羅漢像的背景 130
一、所依法義—羅漢與六字章句陀羅尼禪觀 131
二、所見儀軌—觀音懺儀中的禮敬聖僧儀 136
陸、朝鮮觀音壁畫的衰退與新興薦度儀式畫 138
柒、結論 144
引用書目
|
|---|
| ISSN | 10271112 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 460 |
|---|
| Created date | 2019.03.07 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.03.07 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
