Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
《中論·觀時品》時間哲學之研究=A Philosophical Study of Time Based on the "Chapter on the Examination of Time" of the Mula-madhyamaka-karika
Author 蔡耀明 (著)=Tsai Yao-ming (au.)
Source 正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
Volumen.93
Date2020.06.25
Pages5 - 36
Publisher正觀雜誌社
Publisher Url http://www.tt034.org.tw/
Location南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language中文=Chinese
Note作者為台灣大學哲學系教授
Keyword時間=Time; 自性=own-being; 實體=substance; 實有=real entity; 《中論》=Mula-madhyamaka-karika
Abstract本文以龍樹《中論·觀時品》就時間之考察為主要依據,鋪陳其論題、論旨、與論理方式,從而展開時間哲學之論就。《中論·觀時品》指出,時間概念並非可單獨且客觀存在,而是依存於其他概念且活躍在一套概念群的共構系統。同樣地,就時間向度所做成的分段,例如,過去、現在、未來,也都不是單獨而客觀地存在,而是有賴於不同分段彼此的觀待。人們的時間觀念若無視於時間有關概念群的共構與觀待,其時間觀念將經不起檢視,而淪為謬誤之見。而開發時間之智慧的前提之一,即在於認知且排除時間謬見。

This study focuses on Nagarjuna's examination of time in the Mula-madhyamaka-karikav by analyzing the questions, themes and logical reasoning therein, and then proceeds to inquire into a Buddhist philosophy of time. Throughout the "Chapter on the Examination of Time" of the Mula-madhyamaka-karika, Nagarjuna emphasizes that the concept of time cannot exist objectively in the word independently of related concepts. the related constructs along the linear time dimension, such as past, present, and future, are devoid of own-being and therefore empty. The past, present, and future exist relative to one other, not independent of one other. In this way they are like illusions and do not exist as real entities. The substantialist view of time can hardly stand scrutiny in the view of the manufacture of conceptual constructs. Therefore, the elimination of false views is the first step both to building a robust philosophical theory of time and to achieving wisdom in life.
Table of contents摘要 5
一、緒論 7
二、《中論·觀時品》梵文翻譯與梵漢對照 8
三、《中論·觀時品》之論題與論旨 12
(一)《中論·觀時品》之論題 13
(二)《中論·觀時品》之論旨 17
四、《中論·觀時品》之論理方式 19
(一)「觀待」做為結構與解構 20
(二)「安住」做為結構與解構 21
(三)「緣」做為結構與解構 23
五、就《中論·觀時品》之反思 24
六、結論 28
參考書目 29
ISSN16099575 (P)
Hits1036
Created date2020.09.22
Modified date2021.11.24



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
598099

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse