|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《大智度論》「菩薩三三昧」之探究=The Three Types of Samādhi with the Bodhisattva Path According to the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
釋彌堅 (著)=DI KIEN THICH (au.)
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018 |
|---|
| ページ | 98 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 法鼓文理學院 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.dila.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| 学位 | 修士 |
|---|
| 学校 | 法鼓文理學院 |
|---|
| 学部・学科名 | 佛教學系 |
|---|
| 指導教官 | 釋見弘博士 |
|---|
| 卒業年 | 106 |
|---|
| キーワード | 菩薩三三昧=vaka Path; 聲聞三三昧=3 Samā; 大智度論=dhis; 菩薩道=Bodhisattva Path; 定學=Training through Meditation; 慧學=Training through Wisdom |
|---|
| 抄録 | 《大智度論》(Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra)乃是佛教的重要修行之論書,主要介紹菩薩的修行方法及次第。因此,在論中能充分地找到菩薩修行的系統,以及也找到聲聞及部派佛教修行之間的關係,包括行四禪、四無量心、無色界四處、三十七菩提分、三三昧、八背捨、九次第定等禪修方法。
其中,在論書中「三三昧」(trayaḥ samādhayaḥ)這名詞被提出多次,也是修行上具有重要性的實證法門,並且含有三乘共法的方法。三三昧在早期佛教能看破世間的無常、苦、無我,遠離貪、瞋等煩惱,而入涅槃城門。而菩薩三三昧非完全獨立於聲聞,亦非與聲聞對立,而是建立在聲聞的修學基礎上,又不落入聲聞的果位,即最終不入涅槃,而能行菩薩道,可見菩薩三三昧亦與聲聞三三昧有不同之處。
因此,讓筆者試圖以《大智度論》的菩薩三三昧作為研究的目的,希望能看
出《大智度論》對於菩薩三三昧的教理、修行方法,以及如何在菩薩道有所幫助。本文先從釐清「三三昧」的意義之後,將早期佛教及初期大乘佛教對三三昧的看法。如此顯出《大智度論》菩薩三三昧的觀法特色,並且「菩薩三三昧」的觀法恰好超越了聲聞的修行思想;不住涅槃而含入菩薩道的慈悲、般若波羅蜜、方便之門,廣度無量眾生。特別在於菩薩三三昧注重在於諸法實相的實證,達到無限圓滿的成就,自在人間廣度眾生而不入涅槃。可言:這是菩薩三三昧的修行特色。
The Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra is an important Buddhist treatise which deals with the Bodhisattva practices and stages. In this treatise , we find not only a complete and systematic exposition of the Bodhisattva path, but also connections between the paths and practices of the Śrāvakas and Nikāya Buddhism, including the 4 Dhyānas, the 4 Immeasurables, the 4 levels of the Formless Heaven, the 37 Factors of Enlightenment, the 3 Samādhis, the 8 Renunciations, and the 9 Graduated Concentrations, among other expositions of meditative concentration.
In this text, we find the expression ‘the 3 Samādhis’ (trayaḥ samādhayaḥ) on numerous occasions, and in this way we know this contemplative method of the Three Vehicles in Buddhism, yet at the same time, we can see that it also is a part of Early Buddhism, as well as early Mahāyāna Buddhism. This demonstrates that it is an integral part of and common to all three vehiczles.
In Early Buddhism, the 3 Samādhis allow one to realise the truth of worldly impermanence, suffering, and selflessness, and to depart from afflictions such as desire, ignorance and so on, and achieve Nirvāṇa. However, the 3 Samādhis of the Bodhisattva are neither wholly independent from, nor in opposition to, those of the Śrāvakas, but rather are based on the foundation of the Śrāvaka practice. Moreover, the Bodhisattva application of this practice does not fall into the Śrāvaka stage of realization, yet does not enter into Nirvāṇa either, we can see the 3 Samādhis of the Bodhisattva have different with the 3 Samādhis of the Śrāvaka.
Accordingly, my research goal will be to examine the notion of the 3 Samādhis according to the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra, in order to clarify how this treatise expounds the doctrine of the 3 Samādhis of the Bodhisattva, the related meditative practices, and how these provide assistance on the Bodhisattva path. After clarifying the meaning of the 3 Samādhis, this thesis will then examine how this doctrine is treated in Early Buddhism, Nikāya Buddhism and early Mahāyāna Buddhism. I will also attempt to demonstrate the specificity of the Mahāprajñāpāramitā-śāstra’s view of the 3 Samādhis, and how the Bodhisattva practice of the 3 Samādhis transcends that of the Śrāvakas by not abiding in Nirvāṇa but choosing the Bodhisattva path out of compassion, and practicing the Pāramitās and expedient means in order to liberate countless sentient beings.
The uniqueness of this practice resides in the fact that the Bodhisattva does not seek to achieve liberation by means of the 3 Samādhis, but relying on the 3 Samādhis, will focus on realising the true nature of reality, and attain limitless and complete achievement, and extensively liberate all sentient beings, without entering Nirvāṇa. In a nutshell, it could be said that this is the special characteristic of the Bodhisattva’s practice of the 3 Samādhis. |
|---|
| 目次 | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 問題所在 1
第二節 《大智度論》與前人研究回顧 6
第三節 《大智度論》的作者與內容 11
一、 《大智度論》的作者與翻譯 11
二、 《大智度論》的內容 15
第二章 「三三昧」思想之簡史 19
第一節 三三昧簡介 19
一、 三三昧意義 19
二、 三三昧順序 24
第二節 早期佛教的三三昧 29
一、 《阿含經》與三三昧 29
二、 部派佛教與三三昧 34
第三節 初期大乘佛教的三三昧 38
第四節 小結 42
第三章 《大智度論》「菩薩三三昧」的觀修 44
第一節 菩薩思想 44
一、 菩薩的界說 44
二、 菩薩在《大智度論》的位置 48
三、 菩薩之修證 49
第二節 菩薩與三三昧 52
一、 《大智度論》三三昧的重要性 52
二、 菩薩空三昧 56
三、 菩薩無相三昧 70
四、 菩薩無作三昧 75
第四章 菩薩與聲聞三三昧之差異 77
第一節 觀法與成就 78
第二節 證與不取證涅槃 84
第五章 結論 93
參考書目 95
一、 原典文獻 95
二、 專書與期刊論文 96
三、 外文著作 98 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 267 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.06.16 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.01.07 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
