 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sakya Pandita and the Status of Concepts |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Stoltz, Jonathan
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.56 n.4 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2006.10 |
|---|
| ページ | 567 - 582 |
|---|
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | 佛教人物=Buddhist |
|---|
| 抄録 | The thirteenth-century Tibetan thinker Sakya Pandita was a diehard supporter of nominalism with respect to abstract entities. Here, two arguments given by Sakya Pandita against the robust existence of concepts (don spyi) are analyzed and elucidated. The first argument is rooted in the Buddhist idea that conceptual thought is unsound, whereas the second argument arises from considerations of intersubjectivity and verification. By presenting these arguments we gain both a fuller picture of the central role played by concepts within the Tibetan tradition of philosophy of mind and a better appreciation of the philosophical acuity of the Tibetan polymath Sakya Pandita. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2006.0064 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 1705 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2007.08.31 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
