|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Moral Standing of Animals and Plants in the Manusmṛti |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Framarin, Christopher G.
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.64 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2014 |
|---|
| ページ | 192 - 217 |
|---|
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Philosophy Department and Religious Studies Department, University of Calgary. |
|---|
| 抄録 | Here it is argued that the Manusmṛti attributes direct moral standing to animals and plants at least in part because they are sentient (i.e., capable of pleasure and pain). The argument for this goes as follows. The Manusmṛti claims that certain actions produce merit and demerit, which often cause pleasure and pain. Pleasure and pain are suitable consequences of merit and demerit only if they have value and disvalue. The value and disvalue of pleasure and pain are not derived entirely from the value of the further ends to which they are a means. Hence, the value and disvalue of pleasure and pain are at least partly intrinsic. Hence, any entity capable of pleasure and pain has direct moral standing. The Manusmṛti claims that animals and plants are sentient. So the Manusmṛti attributes direct moral standing to animals and plants, at least in part because they are sentient. |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2014.0006 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 607 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2014.03.13 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
