網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
禪宗的體用研究
作者 杜松柏
出處題名 中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
卷期n.1
出版日期1987.03
頁次229 - 243
出版者中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies
出版者網址 http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
出版地新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese; 英文=English
關鍵詞禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 體用哲學; 慧能; 馬祖道一
摘要有體有用,體用不二. 是宗教家,哲學家的共同見解. 可是在頓悟「明心見性」後,方由體起用,方言體用的,莫過於禪宗了. 然而近人有批評禪宗無本體論者,有認定禪定有不辨體用之嫌者,應係偏見和誤解,本文之作,即在澄清此偏誤. 首由禪宗的成立與修行方法,以見禪宗的特色,與教下諸宗的不同. 復由禪宗祖師開悟後對體用的著語,綜合歸納,以見禪宗的體用觀的精義所在:(一)禪人隨言說的方便,所謂「心」,「性」,「體」,「一物」等,都是「本體」的異名. (二)本體是無是無非,無善無惡,無憂無喜,本自清淨. (三)本體超過一切限量,名言,蹤跡,不可智知,不可理求. (四)本體無形無質,不生不滅,不來不去,沛然充塞於宇宙間,常依體起用. (五)本體是非空非有,亦空亦有,能大能小,應物現形,為萬物萬法之主,體與用故有不二的關係. (六)本體係作用不絕,攝兼動用,動用中收不得,不盡有為,不住無為而又能無不為. (七)本體
於人,係在凡愚而不減,在聖賢而不增,不斷不常,不亂不寂,用處祇是無處. 這體用觀,其精微,其超絕,是高出其他哲學家之上的. 復由禪宗體用觀的特性一節,以證明其精微,其超絕. 因哲學家所言的體用,都是由感覺或思議推論以得,是以每家的體用觀都全然不同,以宋五子濂,洛,關,閩為例,即係如此,他們共同旳弊病,是以思議推論,去思議推論哲學上不可能思議推論的部份,而禪宗則係以渾然直覺的頓悟方法,去證悟體用,故言或有殊,而實義無別,且禪人的頓悟,是要經師資的勘驗,彼此的考校,不可能以未悟為謂悟. 所以禪宗經過頓悟而建立的本體論,是精微而超絕的,為其他的哲學家所不及.

The existence and identity of both substance and function are agreed upon by religious thinkers and philosophers alike. Among them Ch'an masters are unrivalled in terms of giving rise to function from
substance and talking about substance and function only after sudden awakening,i.e. the illumination
of one's own mind and view of one's nature. In modern times, however,some people criticized the
Ch'an School as lacking the concepts of substance and function,while others drew the conclusion that
it does not differentiate between these concepts. The present paper intends to correct these extreme
views and misunderstandings. Firstly,the characteristics of the Ch'an School in comparison with the teaching schools are demonstrated by virtue of the school's formation and cultivation methods. Secondly,a comprehensive synthesis of the pertinent remarks made by enlightened Ch'an masters
reveals the essential substance and function concept of the Ch'an School:(1)"Mind," "nature,""one
thing," and other expressions skilfully used by Ch'an Masters are all different terms denoting the
same "substance". (2)There is no right and wrong, good and evil,sorrow and joy in this substance
which is pure by itself. (3)It transcends all measurements and verbal formation,leaves no traces,
can neither be know through knowledge nor pursued by reason. (4)Substance is formless and immaterial.
Neither does it arise not perish, neither come nor go. It is to be found everywhere in the universe
and,based on it,function arises continously. (5)Substance is neither empty nor existing,yet both
empty as well as existing. Manifesting itself in accordance with objects, it can be great or small.
It is the master of everything. Thus the relationship between substance and function is one
of identity. (6)The function of substance is incesant. It encompasses all activities yet cannot
be limited within their scope. Not in its entirety active and not resting in inactivity,it can do
everything. (7)In relation to man,it is not diminished in a bewildered worldling and not
increased in a hloy man. Neither interrupted nor uninterrupted,neither turbulent nor calm,it can
nowhere be applied intentionally. The subtlety and transcendence of this substance and function concept excels all other philosophies. This is proven in the following section in which its characteristics are discussed. When philosophers discourse of substance and function,they develop their ideas based on feeling or reasoning wherefore their theories differ completely. The neo-Confucianists of the Sung Dynasty are a good illustration of this fact. They tried to find out by logical deduction what cannot be found in this way. On the other hand,Ch'an masters realize substance and function through sudden enlightenment which perceives directly. The expressions they used may differ but their actual meaning is identical. Moreover,their sudden enlightenment has to be certified by a master which excludes the possibility of mistaken "awakening". Thus no other philosophy can compete with t
ISSN10177132 (P)
點閱次數1192
建檔日期1998.07.22
更新日期2017.06.15










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
252175

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽