|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmetaphysical Thinking in Heidegger and Zen Buddhism |
|
|
|
作者 |
Steffney, John
|
出處題名 |
Philosophy East and West
|
卷期 | v.27 n.3 |
出版日期 | 1977.07 |
頁次 | 323 - 335 |
出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
出版者網址 |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
使用語言 | 英文=English |
關鍵詞 | Being; Consciousness; Dasein; Metaphysics; Ontology; Zen Buddhism; Heidegger |
摘要 | In Heidegger's philosophy,getting back to the ground of metaphysics--transcending metaphysics--entails a transcendence of the ordinary function of human consciousness. Zen's transcendence however--especially with regard to subject-object duality--is much more radical than Heidegger's. Even the late Heidegger,Heidegger III,presents his "Ereignis" as a third,appropriating ontological link,existing beyond being and nonbeing. But in Zen this would be classified as "relative" "Sunyata",not "absolute" "Sunyata",which is neither relative nor relational but paradoxical to the extent that it does not even have itself. And in view of Heidegger's concern--obsession--with dread,his "homecoming" itself is questionable. Zen would say that Heidegger's difficulty,right to the end,was that he was still thinking metaphysically,despite his effort otherwise; moreover,that his thinking was never genuinely transmetaphysical but at best quasi-metaphysical. |
ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
DOI | 10.2307/1398002 |
點閱次數 | 1142 |
建檔日期 | 2001.01.17; 2002.03.24
|
更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
|
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。
|