網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
睡眠與圓滿生命 -- 佛教與印度阿育吠陀對睡眠看法的比較研究=Sleep and a Perfect Life: A Comparative Study of the Views on Sleep Between Buddhism and India's Ayurveda
作者 梁國超
出處題名 正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
卷期n.61
出版日期2012.06.25
頁次55 - 121
出版者正觀雜誌社
出版者網址 http://www.tt034.org.tw/
出版地南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
附註項作者為香港大學哲學碩士、臺灣南華大學宗教學研究所碩士生=MPhil, University of Hong Kong; MA student, Graduate Institute of Religious Studies, Nanhua University, Taiwan
關鍵詞睡眠=sleep; 中夜分=madhyama-yama/majjhima-yama; 吉祥獅子臥=recumbent position; 惛眠蓋=thina-middha-nivaranam; 眠心所=the mental factor of middha; 印度阿育吠陀=India's Ayurveda; 妙文集=Susrute Samhita; 闍羅迦集=Caraka Samhita; 三體素tridosas
摘要 睡眠是每個人都要面對的,可惜在佛教學術圈內少有專門論文詳談此一方面。本文為拋磚引玉,擬以之為題,嘗試透過小乘及大乘佛教(這兒以唯識及天台宗為主)的一些經論,及印度阿育吠陀醫療體系的兩部經典醫集《妙聞集》(Susrute Samhita)及《闍羅迦集》(Caraka Samhita)作為主要研究文本,並旁及一些相關現代著作,以比較佛教與阿育吠陀醫學對睡眠的傳統看法有甚麼同異處。研究初步發現兩者的理想抱負都是要追求一種完美無瑕的生命(雖然對完美有不同定義),因此他們對會妨礙此一目標的眠睡抱持一種負面的看法,例如傳統佛教視睡眠為一種會障蔽身心的「蓋」,不利比丘修行終極、究竟的來世解脫;阿育吠陀是眠為一種先天罪惡,不利人們追求健康、愉快的現世人生。可是,除此之外,他們其餘對睡眠的觀念差異較大,原因在於兩者的關懷對象不同--前者主要針對出家禪修眾,故強調眠的心理層面,後者主要針對在家眾,故強調眠的生理層面,針對不同體質的人建議不同的睡眠規律;關懷時限亦不同--前者著重來世或出世間利益,後者著重今世或世間利益。

A good sleep is a sine qua non of a healthy perfect life. In the Buddhist discipline, research on the topic is limited, though in other disciplines research outputs are, rather, abundant. Therefore, this paper intends to do a preliminary research on the topic and tries to compare and contrast the views on sleep between Buddhism and India’s Ayurveda by resorting to literature such as the early and later Buddhist scriptures, especially those from the schools of Mere-consciousness and Tientai, as well as two of the medical classics in ancient India, i.e. Susrute Samhita and Caraka Samhita. Modern works that cover the topic will also be cited and discussed. Our research shows that both systems of thought target at the pursuit of a perfect life. Influenced by their views on sleep, they concur with each other that (abnormal) sleep itself is a hindrance to the divine attainment of liberation mental and physical. However, there are also significant differences between Buddhism and Ayurveda regarding sleep, as the target collectives of the two are, basically, speaking, not the same crowd—the former has Buddhist cultivators as its target audience, and the latter household laity as readership. This inevitably brings considerable variations in their analyses on sleep. Buddhists tend to look at the problem from the mental perspectives, while Ayurveda from the physical perspectives. It should be noted that Ayurveda practitioners also give fitting sleeping guidelines according to one’s constitution (or to be more precise, dosas), which the Buddhists, more often than not, fail to do the same.

目次前言 57
甲、佛教對睡眠的看法 58
一、大乘唯識的看法 59
二、大乘天台的看法 68
乙、印度阿育吠陀對睡眠的看法 74
一、印度阿育吠陀醫學對睡眠的分類 75
二、「三體素」的增減與睡眠的關係 89
三、不同體素者的睡眠模式 102
丙、結語 110
ISSN16099575 (P)
點閱次數1510
建檔日期2012.10.29
更新日期2017.09.06










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
380445

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽