KATRIN FROESE, Professor, Departments of Religious Studies and Philosophy, University of Calgary. Specialties: continental philosophy, comparative philosophy, early Chinese philosophy. E-mail: froese@ucalgary.ca
摘要
Both Heidegger and Linji throw into question dualistic relationships, which for Heidegger stem from a subject–object dichotomy associated with Western metaphysics and for Linji result from a reification of conventions, social structure, and language. In Contributions to Philosophy, Heidegger emphasizes the moment of the event (Ereignis) in which Da-sein becomes the site for Being's appearance and withdrawal. In the Linjilu conventions and concepts collapse in moments of social encounter often involving physical violence intended to serve as a counterpoint to the reifying tendencies of the mind. But while Heidegger suggests that he is engaging in a process of overcoming metaphysics, the Linjilu suggests that the process of un-doing the effects of reified and conceptual language is an ongoing one which depends and grows out of the very reification it throws into question.
目次
I.Introduction 470 II.Heidegger's Ereignis 471 III.“Non-Duality” in the Linjilu 477 IV.Heidegger and Linji: A Comparison 483
