網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


本資料由 Mr. Bruno Contestabile 提供
加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
Secular Buddhism and Justice
作者 Contestabile, Bruno
出處題名 Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal
卷期v.19 n.2
出版日期2018.11
頁次237 - 250
出版者Routledge
出版者網址 https://www.routledge.com/
出版地Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言英文=English
附註項Full text available from https://www.socrethics.com/Folder2/Secular-Buddhism.htm
摘要Starting point: The core idea of secular Buddhism is to grasp the spirit of early Buddhism and transpose it into the present. The best known approach to implement this idea is Stephen Batchelor’s Buddhism Without Beliefs, an approach which advocates an agnostic stance with regard to the doctrine of rebirth and denies its relevance for daily practice.

Type of problem:
Is there a way to revise the doctrine of rebirth, instead of completely dropping it?
What is the impact on the notion of justice?

Result: The doctrine of rebirth cannot be revised in a strict sense, but there are some striking similarities between the ancient and modern (biological) view on the topic. Since the stream of genetic and epigenetic information has the power to create consciousness and reflects experiences of past lives, it can be associated with the stream of consciousness (cittasantāna) in the Mahayana model of rebirth. Parents not only determine the genetic constitution of their children, they also transfer character traits by means of epigenetic heredity. If genetic inheritance is associated with karma, then genes become an element of synchronic and diachronic connectedness (pratītya-samutpāda). Instead of an individual learning process across successive lives, there is a collective learning process across successive generations.

Given the biological model of rebirth, the belief in cosmic justice turns into a quest for mundane justice. There is a thought experiment for constructing such a concept, which complies well with the secular Buddhist spirit. John Rawls assumes that the legislative deliberation is taking place ‘behind a veil of ignorance’, so that the participants of the deliberation do not know their future genetic constitution and their future position within the society. If the participants imagine that their future self is contingent and impermanent – in accordance with the Buddhist doctrine of anātman and anitya – then the resulting principles of justice will be impartial.
目次1. Introduction
2. A Mahayana Model of Rebirth
3. The Biological Model of Rebirth
4. The Loss of Cosmic Justice
5. The Construction of Mundane Justice
6. Concerns
7. Conclusion

ISSN14639947 (P); 14767953 (E)
DOI10.1080/14639947.2018.1442144
點閱次數198
建檔日期2019.08.19
更新日期2022.05.17










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
587240

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽