 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
何決是非偏破西明？—以「尋伺」的案例研究=Why Woncheuk was considered as an opponent of Huizhao among Xuanzang’s disciples: Case Studies of Xunsi |
|
|
|
| Author |
楊得煜 (著)=Yang, De-yu (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
2023 第九屆漢傳佛教與聖嚴思想國際學術研討會
|
|---|
| Date | 2023.06.29 |
|---|
| Publisher | 財團法人聖嚴教育基金會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.shengyen.org.tw/index.aspx?lang=cht
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北, 臺灣 [Taipei, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 圓測=Woncheuk; 慧沼=Huizhao; 尋伺=Cheng weishi lun; 無分別智=Xunsi (vitarka-vicāra); 成唯識論=nirvikalpa-jñāna |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文所關注的「圓測唯識思想型態定位」之問題，目的在於：「如何解讀慧沼對於圓測在唯識學議題上的批判？藉以探討七世紀時，玄奘門下之間的論諍」。本文將在《成唯識論》的相關注疏中，議題化一個案例研究，即：「尋伺」。此議題是牽涉到到佛教在實踐上的一個張力，即：「非概念化認識」與「語言活動」。本文預計透過這此議題來探討玄奘門下為何會出現 彼此競爭的「唯識模型」，並試圖解釋其背後理由，希望有助於解決東亞唯識學系譜中，「圓測唯識思想定位」之問題；同時亦反省上田義文 (1904-1993)所建立的「唯
識學系譜」之解釋效力。
This study reviews the controversy concerning the origins of Woncheuk’s Yogâcāra thought forms to determine how Huizhao’s critiques of Woncheuk should be inferred. Subsequently, it discusses the arguments mooted by Xuanzang’s disciples in the 7th century. I derive and establish one philosophical issues from the commentaries of Cheng weishi lun: the idea of Xunsi (vitarka-vicāra). The issue relates to the tension in Buddhist philosophical practice between nonconceptual cognition and language. I investigate the appearance of competitive models among Xuanzang's disciples and try to elucidate this issues that influenced their emergence. I expect this investigation to contribute to the resolution of questions about the East Asian Yogâcāra lineage and the origins of Woncheuk’s Yogâcāra thought form. I will simultaneously attempt to review the explanatory power of the East Asian Yogâcāra lineage established by Yoshifumi Ueda (1904–1993). |
|---|
| Hits | 15 |
|---|
| Created date | 2024.10.04 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.10.08 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
