|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
覺浪道盛的以禪解儒=Daosheng's Interpretation of Confucianism through Zen |
|
|
|
| Author |
徐聖心 (著)=Hsu, Sheng-hsin (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
2023 第九屆漢傳佛教與聖嚴思想國際學術研討會
|
|---|
| Date | 2023.06.29 |
|---|
| Publisher | 財團法人聖嚴教育基金會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.shengyen.org.tw/index.aspx?lang=cht
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北, 臺灣 [Taipei, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 覺浪道盛=Juelang Daosheng; 孔子=Confucius; 顏淵=Yan-Hui; 不貳過; 生死學=Life-and-death Studies |
|---|
| Abstract | 晚明禪僧道盛對儒學有其同情的理解，對孔子其人其學別具共鳴與洞見，對《論語》頗見精釋。故本文試闡明其說，以見佛門解儒書之妙義。歷來對顏子之所好何學，雖是儒學關注焦點之一，然而對此好學內容的關鍵句「不遷怒，不貳過」，卻沒有較允妥的解釋；此外孔子對「生死」問題究持何見解，歷來教外也多異說。正巧，道盛對這兩大爭議主題都有出人意表的談論，因此本文藉其說由三方面加以考察： ：(1)先藉由道盛對「不貳過」的解釋，試探新解的可能。其說雖逸出傳統，但可提供新視點。本文將導向對「人的有限性」問題的回應。 (2)此等有限性的極端，即死亡。一般認為《論語》罕言死亡問題，存錄數章反遺後世言淺之譏，本文亦藉道盛對「朝聞道，夕死可矣」章活潑切要的演示與提點，足為後人悟入孔門論生死問題之參照。 (3)順前兩則的相關引文，附帶出了道盛暗示孔子教法與禪相應的特色。總之，本文藉拈出道盛兩章新解，觀其如何藉儒典以申明佛學？其闡釋又隱涵那些深義？又對孔子教法有何提點？且看道盛與孔子的千古相發。
The late Ming Zen monk Dao Sheng has a sympathetic understanding of Confucianism, and has a special empathy and insight into the person and learning of Confucius, as well as a fine interpretation of the Analects. Therefore, in this paper, we will try to clarify his words in order to see the wonderful meaning of Buddhist interpretation of Confucianism. Although the focus of Confucianism has been on the “what he likes to learn” of Yanzi, the key phrase of 'not to relent in anger, not to be unsettled by one’s own fault', has not been properly explained; and Confucius' views on the issue of "life and death" have also been subject to disagreement outside of the Confucianism. It so happens that Daosheng has a surprising discussion on these two controversial topics, so this paper examines them in three ways: (1) First, by using Daosheng's explanation of "not to be incomplete", we will explore the possibility of a new interpretation. Although it is out of the tradition, it can provide a new perspective. This paper will lead to a response to the question of “human finitude”. (2) The extreme of such finiteness is death. It is generally believed that the Analects of Confucius does not speak much about death, and that the few chapters that have been recorded are a reflection of the superficiality of the later generations. (3) The two quotations from the previous two chapters are used to illustrate the characteristics of Confucius' teachings corresponding to Zen. In conclusion, this essay has brought out two new interpretations of Dao Sheng's chapters to see how he affirms Buddhism through Confucian texts. What are the deeper meanings implied by the interpretations? And what does he say about Confucius' teachings? Let us see how Dosheng and Confucius have developed over the ages. |
|---|
| Hits | 37 |
|---|
| Created date | 2024.10.08 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.10.08 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
