|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
再議種子（bīja）與種子性（bījabhāva）=Bīja and Bījabhāva Revisited |
|
|
|
| Author |
高明元 (著)=Gao, Ming-yuan (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
2023 第九屆漢傳佛教與聖嚴思想國際學術研討會
|
|---|
| Date | 2023.07.01 |
|---|
| Publisher | 財團法人聖嚴教育基金會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.shengyen.org.tw/index.aspx?lang=cht
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北, 臺灣 [Taipei, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 種子=bīja; 種子性=bīja-bhāva; 瑜珈行派=Yogācāra; 經量部=Sautrāntika; 次第因果=successive causality; 同時因果=simultaneous causality |
|---|
| Abstract | 通過檢視《阿毘達磨俱舍論》及其注釋中為數不多有關 「種子」(bīja) 和「種子性」(bījabhāva)的段落兵藤一夫主張世親明確地區分了「種子」與「種子性」，意即：「種子性」 是相續 santati 中的生果功能 śakti而「種子」
則是持有此功能的名色 nāmarūpa。這一觀點為包括加藤純章及Park Changhwan等諸多學者所普遍接受。例如， Park認為「種子」展現了種子在植物學方面的歷時性特徵 即作為「相續轉變差別」（santati-pariṇāma-viśeṣa)
的業之因果；「種子性」則展現了其作為潛能方面的共時性特征，即隨眠anuśaya 與纏paryavasthāna 同時存在。 然而法光法師 KL Dhammajoti基於《瑜伽師地論》中有關隨眠的一則討論，主張「種子性」是「種子」的同義詞。
本文重新考察了阿毘達磨俱舍論與《瑜伽師地論》中有關「種子」和「種子性」的段落，並主張「種子性」在本質上並不暗示任何時間性，而僅表示「種子」的因果機制。「種子性」是否表示種果之間的同時性關係取決於特定佛教部派的理論範式。
By examining the few occurrences of bīja and bījabhāva in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and its commentaries, Kazuo Hyōdō concludes that Vasubandhu clearly distinguishes bīja from bījabhāva. According to Hyōdō, bījabhāva denotes the capability (śakti) to generate effect in the serial continuity (saṃtati) while bīja refers to the nāmarūpa that holds such a capability. Hyōdō’s opinion has been widely accepted by many scholars, such as Junshō Katō and Changhwan Park. For example, Park holds that bīja demonstrates the diachronic botanical aspect of seed—the karmic causality known as saṃtati-pariṇāma-viśeṣa, while bījabhāva demonstrates the synchronic subliminal aspect of seed—the anuśaya which co-exists with the paryavasthāna. However, KL Dhammajoti based on one example concerning anuśaya in the Yogācārabhūmi asserts that bījabhāva is synonymous with bīja. This paper examines the occurrences of bīja and bījabhāva in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya and the Yogācārabhūmi. It will be argued that bījabhāva does not inherently imply temporality, but only means the causal mechanism of seed. Whether bījabhāva suggests simultaneity between seed and its fruit depends on the theoretical paradigm of a specific Buddhist school. |
|---|
| Hits | 19 |
|---|
| Created date | 2024.10.16 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.10.16 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
