|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
破解偶像 -- 從《維摩詰所說經通論》談佛教經典的詮釋方法=Destroy idols: Talk about annotation of Buddhism Sutra from the review of Vimalakirti-Nivdesa Sutra |
|
|
|
Author |
孫勁松 (著)=Sung, Jin-song (au.)
|
Source |
成大宗教與文化學報=Journal of Religion and Culture of National Cheng Kung University
|
Volume | n.2 |
Date | 2002.12 |
Pages | 79 - 99 |
Publisher | 國立成功大學中國文學系宗教與文化研究室 |
Publisher Url |
http://zhncku.med.ncku.edu.tw/buddhism/list.php
|
Location | 臺南市, 臺灣 [Tainan shih, Taiwan] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 中文=Chinese |
Keyword | 程俱=Chen Ju; 維摩詰所說經通論=the comment of Vimalakirti-Nivdesa Sutra; 理事互融=explaining Myth by Principle; 偶像=idols |
Abstract | 佛教經典基本上是“理事互融”的結構,就“事相”而言,對佛教經典的詮釋有以事解事、以理解事兩種基本的詮釋方法,以法釋相是以理解事的特殊形式。程俱爲南宋士大夫,著有《維摩詰所說經通論》,《通論》受莊學等中國本土文化的影響,在禪宗詮釋方法的基礎上,將“以法釋相、以理解事”用到極處,指出佛教中的佛、菩薩形象都是象徵性的,並非外在的偶像,這種詮釋是儒釋道得以交融的關鍵原因。
Buddhism Sutra’s structure is basically “fusing Principle and Myth together”. According to “Myth -Idol”, there are two elemental kinds of annotation of Buddhism Sutra, one is explaining Myth by Myth, and the other is explaining Myth by Principle. Explaining Myth by Avenue is a special form of explaining Myth by Principle . Chen Ju, a scholar-bureaucrat in Nan Song Dynasty, wrote the comment of Vimalakirti-Nivdesa Sutra. Influenced by indigenous cultures such as Zhuangzi, the reeview was based on annotation of Zen and developed “Explaining Idol by Avenue ” and “explaining Myth by Principle ” to the extreme. Chen Ju argued that the figures of Buddha and Bodhisattva were symbolistic idols rather than objective ones. The kind of annotation was why Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism could fuse into one. |
Table of contents | 一、程俱的詮釋方法概述 81 二、《維摩詰所說經》的行文結構與教下僧侶的詮釋方法 86 三、《易》《莊》與禪宗破相化的詮釋 87 四、程俱破相詮釋法略評 88 附:《維摩詰所說經》通論八篇 90
|
ISSN | 18136400 (P); 18136400 (E) |
Hits | 1729 |
Created date | 2005.11.25 |
Modified date | 2017.08.16 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|