Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
敦煌本《蒙求》與六種注本徵引書目同異情況之分析=Analysis of Similarities and Differences between Dunhuang Manuscript Mengqiu and the Six Types of Annotated Bibliography
Author 鄭亦寧 (著)=Zheng, Yi-ning (au.)
Source 敦煌學=Studies on Tun-huang
Volumen.37
Date2021.08.01
Pages195 - 216
Publisher南華大學敦煌學研究中心
Publisher Url https://nhdh.nhu.edu.tw/Web/Index
Location嘉義縣, 臺灣 [Chia-i hsien, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language中文=Chinese
Keyword蒙求=Mengqiu; 敦煌本=Dunhuang manuscript; 徵引書目=quoted bibliography
Abstract敦煌本《蒙求》長期流傳於唐五代的敦煌地區,是目前學界公認成書年代最早,最能體現唐五代社會歷史文化風貌,同時也最接近李翰原注的《蒙求》注本,因此具有極高的研究價值。以敦煌本《蒙求》為標準,對比後世諸種《蒙求》注本,能夠獲取諸多豐富的歷史信息。本文以敦煌本《蒙求》注文中的「徵引書目」具體研究對象,通過與其他六種重要的《蒙求》注本對比,查找同異,探究成因,從而解析不同時代社會歷史文化風貌之特點。

Dunhuang manuscript Mengqiu (蒙求) has long been circulated in Dunhuang during the Tang and Five Dynasties. It is currently recognized by the academic circles as the earliest book written, and the book that best reflects the social, historical and cultural features of the Tang and Five Dynasties. At the same time, it is the closest to Li Han's original annotation of Mengqiu, so it has extremely high research value. Therefore, taking the Dunhuang manuscript of Mengqiu as the standard, and comparing the annotations of later generations of Mengqiu, we can obtain a lot of rich historical information. Based on this, this article takes the "quoted bibliography" in Dunhuang manuscript Mengqiu as the specific research object. Through the comparison with other six important Mengqiu annotations, to find the similarities and differences, and explore the causes, in order to achieve the purpose of analyzing the characteristics of the social, historical and cultural features of different eras.
Table of contents一、前言 197
二、《蒙求》注本分類概述 197
三、敦煌本《蒙求》注文與其他注本之徵引書目對比 199
四、敦煌本與其他六種注文本徵引書目同異之分析 204
(一)徵引書目基本相同的歷史文化分析 204
(二)徵引書目相異的歷史文化分析 207
1.敦煌本抄寫訛誤或簡省書名 207
2.敦煌本徵引的書目散軼 208
3.敦煌本徵引書目被同類書目取代 209
4.典故本身存有爭議 210
五、結語 213
主要參考文獻215
ISSN10159339 (P)
Hits129
Created date2022.04.15
Modified date2022.04.15



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
637781

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse