Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
儒釋性論之辯:以羅欽順闢佛「以覺為性」為中心=Debate on the Nature Theory of Confucianism and Buddhism - Based on the Perspective of Confucianist Luo Qinshun Criticizing Buddhism "Consciousness is Nature"
Author 陳思吟 (著)=Chen, Siyin (au.)
Source 哲學與文化=Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture
Volumev.50 n.5
Date2023.05
Pages183 - 196
Publisher哲學與文化月刊雜誌社
Publisher Url http://www.umrpc.fju.edu.tw
Location臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language中文=Chinese
Note陳思吟,南京大學哲學系博士生。
Keyword以覺為性=Consciousness is Nature; 性=Nature ; 道德=Morality; 儒家= Confucianism ; 佛教= Buddhism
Abstract自佛教傳入中土開始,儒家與佛教就不斷地爭鋒、交流和融合,心性論是儒家與佛教相互影響和爭論的重要領域。學界對儒釋心性論及其互動和同異已經有許多論述,但少有基於儒者闢佛視角的研究,尤其對宋明儒者自己總結的「以覺為性」等闢佛命題缺乏深入研究,然而該命題不僅凝結了儒者對儒釋性論差異的思考,更清晰地彰顯了儒釋性論的根本分野,通過對「以覺為性」的研究有助於更好地理解儒釋性論的內涵、異同以及局限性,啟發對人性更深刻的思考。

Since Buddhism was introduced into China, Confucianism and Buddhism have been competing, communicating and integrating. The mind-nature theory is an important field of interaction and debate between Confucianism and Buddhism. There have been many discussions on the mind nature theory of Confucianism and Buddhism and its interaction, similarities and differences, but there are few studies based on the perspective of Confucianism criticizing Buddhism. In particular, there is a lack of in-depth research on the proposition of "consciousness is nature" summarized by the Confucians in the Song and Ming Dynasties. However, this proposition not only condenses the Confucians' thinking on the differences between Confucianism and Buddhism, but also clearly highlights the fundamental distinction between Confucianism and Buddhism. The study will help to better understand the connotation, similarities and differences and limitations of Confucianism and Buddhism, and inspire more profound thinking on human nature.
Table of contents壹、「以覺為性」彰顯儒釋性論的根本分野 184
貳、儒家內部對「以覺為性」的兩重拓展 187
參、佛家對「以覺為性」的回應 189
肆、圍繞「以覺為性」的討論所展現出儒釋性論的局限性 192
伍、結語 194
參考文獻 194
ISSN10158383 (P); 10158383 (E)
Hits42
Created date2023.06.28
Modified date2023.06.28



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
674182

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse