|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition as Identity, the Identical With or Different From Argument in Bodhicaryāvatāra 8.90–103 (and Elsewhere), and Category Mistakes |
|
|
|
| Author |
Falls, Edward (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| Volume | v.72 n.4 |
|---|
| Date | 2022.10 |
|---|
| Pages | 940 - 959 |
|---|
| Publisher | University of Hawaii Press |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Note | Author Affiliation: University of Tennessee-Knoxville, USA. |
|---|
| Abstract | Paul Williams critiques Śāntideva's argument, claiming it rests on a category mistake. I suggest that if Williams' critique were sound, then the debate about composition as identity in recent analytic metaphysics would also be nonsensical. My argument is that Williams' objection does not make sense when dealing with absolutely general concepts such as the concepts of identity and parthood. |
|---|
| Table of contents | I. Compositional Nihilism in Williams’ Critique of Śāntideva’s Argument 941
II. ID Arguments and Strong Composition as Identity 943
III. The Category Mistake Objection 948
IV. The Absolute Generality of the Identity Concept 950
V. Conclusion 953
Notes 955
References 956 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2022.0090 |
|---|
| Hits | 135 |
|---|
| Created date | 2024.03.15 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.03.19 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
