 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
理、行兩種佛性說法的形成和演變=The Distinction between "Buddha-nature as Principle" and "Buddha-nature as Practice": Origin and Development |
|
|
|
| Author |
廖明活 (撰)=Liu, Ming-wood (compose)
|
|---|
| Source |
佛學研究中心學報=Journal of the Center for Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.10 |
|---|
| Date | 2005.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 119 - 150 |
|---|
| Publisher | 國立臺灣大學佛學研究中心=The Center for Buddhist Studies, National Taiwan University |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~ntucbs/
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 佛性=Buddha Nature=Buddha-dhatu=Buddha-gotra=Buddhahood; 大般涅槃經=涅槃經=Mahaparinibbana Sutra; 地論師; 如來藏=Tathagata-garbha=Tathagatagarbha; 法相宗=法相唯識宗=慈恩宗=Yogacara Buddhism; 五種種性; 無漏種子; 三種佛性; 行佛性; 理佛性 |
|---|
| Abstract | 佛性學說在東晉末年 (五世紀初葉)，隨著以佛性為中心主題的大乘《涅槃經》譯出，開始在中國受到注意；尋且在南北朝時期，成為廣受關注的佛教理論課題；更而在隋、唐時期，為各佛教學派所吸納，作為其教學體系的主要教理範疇；對中國佛教思想的形成和發展，產生深遠影響。又各學派的思想進路不同，推尊的經論互異，它們各依自身的教學取向，對佛性問題作出分析，並且交相評難；其立論牽涉及各層面的佛性釋義和分類的提出、以及多種跟佛性相關觀念的重新詮釋，饒富名理趣味。本文所討論的理、行兩種佛性類別的出現和演變，正是中國佛性論這發展的典型寫照。
The distinction between "Buddha-nature as principle" and "Buddha-nature as practice" has often been regarded as an integral feature of the Buddha-nature teaching of the Faxiang School. This paper traces the origin of the distinction to
the Dilun masters of the sixth century, who proposed the distinction to explain the presence of the conflicting ideas of "inherent possession"(penyou) and "acquired possession"(shiyou) in the Mahayana Mahaparinirvana-sutra. It goes on to describe how the distinction was adopted by the founders of the Faxiang School in the seventh century to reconcile their teaching of five lineages affirming the existence of sentient beings incapable of attaining Buddhahood, and the popular belief of universal Buddhahood. The bulk of the paper is devoted to examining the role the distinction played in the subsequent debates between the Faxiang masters and their critics over various issues related to the teaching of five lineages. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、地論師與理、行兩種佛性說法的形成 123
二、法相宗的種性理論和理、行兩種佛性涵義的轉變 127
三、初唐佛性論爭中有關理佛性、行佛性的論議(1)──靈潤、神泰和義榮 130
四、初唐佛性論爭中有關理佛性、行佛性的論議(2)──法寶和慧沼 136
(一)法寶對行佛性非一切眾生所有說法的質難、以及對理性觀念的詮釋 136
(二)慧沼對理、行兩種佛性的釋說、以及對法寶的質難的回應 140
五、 結論 148 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10271112 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 3375 |
|---|
| Created date | 2005.09.26 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.07.03 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
