 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
吳汝鈞
|
|---|
| Source |
華岡佛學學報=Hwakang Buddhist Journal
|
|---|
| Volume | n.8 |
|---|
| Date | 1985.10 |
|---|
| Pages | 237 - 256 |
|---|
| Publisher | 中華學術院佛學研究所 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 般若經; 空; 邏輯; 自性; 無住; 心經; 金剛經 |
|---|
| Abstract | 般若思想常被一些日本及西方學者認為是違離形式邏輯
規律，是超理性或是神秘主義. 本文作者以為這些學者似乎
太快便作這樣的結論，故忽略了其中的理性成素. 作者以
為，般若思想的最後歸宿，自是超理性或神秘主義的;但在
這前，它有很多思考是理性的，尤其是可通過「無自性空
」一義理來理解. 這種義理有幾種表現形式如雙邊否定，空
空，即非的詭辭. 本文的目的，是要探就般若思想的這種空
義及這些表現形式.
Some Japanese and Western scholars are used to
assume that `prajnaparamita` thought violates the
rules of formal logic. They regard it as
transcending rationality or mystical but neglecting
its rational part arrive，in the author's mind,
perhaps too rash at this conclusion. The final aim
of `prajnaparamita` thought is, of course,
transcending rationality or mystical yet many
reflections in the preceding stages are rational.
This is especially easy to understand in case of the
principle of "emptiness by way of absence of self
nature." This principle is expressed in several ways
like argumentation through the negation of both
extremes, the emptiness of emptiness, identity and
non-identity etc. The aim of the present paper is to
study both this kind of emptiness in
`prajnaparamita` thought as well as the said forms
of expression. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、資料問題與研究限度 238
二、空的表面的矛盾性 240
三、空是自性的否定 241
四、雙邊否定 242
五、空空邏輯與無住 243
六、即非的詭辭 245
七、對世界的態度 246
八、關于“色即是空，空即是色” 247
九、關于“空相”問題 248
十、關于“空中無色”與“無無明盡” 250
|
|---|
| Hits | 1471 |
|---|
| Created date | 1998.07.22
|
|---|
| Modified date | 2017.08.17 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
