|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
量子世界不是客觀存在的=The Quantum World is not an Objective Reality |
|
|
|
| Author |
陳俊霖 (著)=Chen, Jin-lin (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
佛學與科學=Buddhism and Science
|
|---|
| Volume | v.19 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2018.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 6 - 15 |
|---|
| Publisher | 圓覺文教基金會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.obf.org.tw
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 客觀存在=objective reality; 實在論=realism; 量子力學=quantum mechanics; 哥本哈根詮釋=Copenhagen interpretation |
|---|
| Abstract | 古典物理的哲學觀為「實在論」，它只重視物而忽略心。相反的，量子力學的哲學觀為沒有客觀存在的實體，它包含了「能觀測的心」與「被觀測之物」，也闡明了兩者之間的關係。已經有大量的科學證據顯示，如果要完美的解釋這些量子實驗結果，就無法將「觀測者」排除在外，因此「科學實在論」只是一個虛幻的假設且經不起量子實驗的驗證。經過深入的探討之後，我們可以確知量子力學的「哥本哈根詮釋」與佛法中「能知」與「被知」的說法完全一致。
The philosophy of classical physics is "realism". It only attaches importance to the── “matter” but ignores the “mind”. On the other hand, the philosophy of quantum mechanics is that there is no objective entity. The philosophy of quantum
mechanics clarifies the relationship between the “able-observing mind” and the “observed object”. Plenty of scientific evidences show that someone want to perfectly interpret the results of these quantum experiments, the "observers" cannot be excluded. Therefore, "scientific realism" is merely an illusory hypothesis that cannot be verified by quantum experiments. After further discussion, we can be sure that the "Copenhagen interpretation" of quantum mechanics is perfectly consistent with what is the version of "knowing" and "being known" in Buddhism. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 壹、前言 6
貳、波粒二象性與雙狹縫干涉實驗 7
參、運動軌跡的探討 8
肆、觀察者的介入與「哥本哈根詮釋」 9
伍、玻爾與愛因斯坦之論戰—EPR 悖論與量子糾纏態 10
陸、「能知」與「被知」對應於「古典力學」與「量子力學」 11
柒、結論 12
致謝 13
參考文獻 13 |
|---|
| ISSN | 16072952 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 425 |
|---|
| Created date | 2018.04.30 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2018.04.30 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
