|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
論證鐘慢效應本為觀測者效應=Proof the Time Dilation Effect is Essentially the Observer Effect |
|
|
|
| Author |
林哲銘 =Lin, Che-ming
|
|---|
| Source |
佛學與科學=Buddhism and Science
|
|---|
| Volume | v.20 n.1 |
|---|
| Date | 2019.03 |
|---|
| Pages | 6 - 36 |
|---|
| Publisher | 圓覺文教基金會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.obf.org.tw
|
|---|
| Location | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 鐘慢效應=time dilation effect; 狹義相對論=the special theory of relativity; 光速恆定性=constancy of the speed of light; 觀測者效應=observer effect |
|---|
| Abstract | 本文旨在說明鐘慢效應和量子坍縮效應很可能是「系出同源」的效應。鐘慢效應指的是相對論中時間流逝變慢的效應。本文試圖證明鐘慢效應和量子坍縮效應皆由觀察者的觀測所形成。狹義相對論和量子力學的立論基礎分別是光速恆定性與波粒二象性，這兩個基礎怪誕無比，而且和「觀察者的觀測」密不可分。光速恆定性的怪誕程度並不亞於波粒二象性，令人納悶的是物理學界僅注意到波粒二象性的怪誕性，卻沒注意到光速恆定性的怪誕性，於是乎，大家只意識到量子力學很詭異，卻沒意識到狹義相對論也很詭異。敏感度的喪失意味著洞察力的喪失，如此一來，就沒有人領悟到狹義相對論和量子力學其實是「系出同源」的理論（因為兩者皆根源於詭異的觀測者效應）。狹義相對論的巨大威力源自光速恆定性，量子力學的巨大威力源自波粒二象性，令人扼腕的是，物理學界長期以來對於光速恆定性與波粒二象性不求甚解，導致我們遲遲無法提出比相對論和量子力學更深刻、更完備、更接近真理和更具威力的科學理論，而僅僅滿足於以客觀表象來計算客觀表象的層次。想要找到相對論和量子力學共同的淵源，關鍵在於破解觀測者效應，其第一步須釐清主流物理學界對於孿生子悖論所抱持的各種錯誤見解。孿生子悖論的癥結點在於觀測者，不在於加速度，因為孿生子悖論是光速恆定性之謎所衍生出來的邏輯矛盾。鐘慢效應和量子坍縮效應若經證實由「觀測者的意識」所引發，那麼，主觀現實和客觀現實的藩籬將被打破。主、客觀互換（心物互換）的意義重大，可能會同時引發物理學革命、世界觀革命、哲學革命、醫學革命、航太技術革命和產業技術革命。
This article shows that the time dilation effect and quantum collapse effect are likely homologous. The time dilation effect refers to the slowing of time in the theory of relativity. This paper attempts to prove that the time dilation effect and the quantum collapse effect are caused by the observation of observers. The special theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are respectively based on light-speed constancy and wave-particle duality. These two foundations are fundamentally weird and cannot be separated from the “observation of observers”. The degree of weirdness of light-speed constancy is no less than that of wave-particle duality, and it is puzzling that the physics community has noted only the latter and not the former. As a result, despite the general awareness of the innate weirdness of quantum mechanics, the weirdness of the special theory of relativity has been overlooked. Loss of sensitivity produces a loss of insight, and thus no one can grasp the fact that the special theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are homologous theories (because both are rooted in the weird observer effect). The power of the special theory of relativity is derived from light-speed constancy, while the power of quantum mechanics is derived from wave-particle duality. However, the physics community has long avoided seeking a thorough understanding of these two phenomena. As a result, we have been unable to produce scientific theories that provide a deeper and more complete understanding that relativity and quantum mechanics, or to develop new theories that are more comprehensive and powerful, and must currently be satisfied with using superficial phenomena to calculate superficial phenomena. The key to identifying a common source for relativity and quantum mechanics lies in breaking through the observer effect. The first step is to clarify misconceptions held by the mainstream physics community in regards to the Twin paradox. The crux of this paradox lies in the observer, not in the acceleration, because it is a logical contradiction derived from the mystery of light-speed constancy. Showing that the time dilation effect and the quantum collapse effect are triggered by “observer’s awareness” would pierce the barrier between subjective and objective reality. These subjectivity-objectivity exchanges (mind-matter exchanges) are highly significant, and may also trigger a revolution in multiple domains including physics, world outlook, philosophy, medicine, aerospace technology and industrial technologies.
|
|---|
| Table of contents | 摘要 6
壹、前言 6
貳、重新檢視孿生子悖論 9
參、檢視「等速運動版」的孿生子悖論 11
肆、檢視「加速運動版」的孿生子悖論 17
伍、主觀現實和客觀現實能夠互相轉換 27
陸、結論 31
參考文獻 34
|
|---|
| ISSN | 16072952 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 705 |
|---|
| Created date | 2019.06.24 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2019.06.24 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
