Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
Missed Exit: How The Hegel Of 1802 Almost Became a Chinese Philosopher
Author Ziporyn, Brook
Source Journal of Chinese Philosophy
Volumev.44 n.3-4
Date2017.09-12
Pages127 - 153
PublisherInternational Society for Chinese Philosophy
Publisher Url https://iscp-online1.org/
LocationHonolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
Note1. Special Theme: Hegel and China: “Orientalism” and Inter‐cultural Differences (Part I)
2. Author Affiliations: Professor of Chinese Religion, Philosophy and Comparative Thought, Divinity School, University of Chicago
AbstractThe Middle or Center (zhong 中) is one of the most unignorably recurring motifs in almost all Chinese philosophy, in all periods, in all schools, not only in ethics but in epistemology, metaphysics and ontology as well. It is a motif that is, however, glaringly lacking in resonance in most European philosophy, with the exception of a few brief appearances in the realm of ancient Greek virtue ethics. This paper explores a short‐lived exception to this generalization: when Kant (particularly the Kant of the Critique of Judgment) got mingled with Spinoza in the minds of Schelling and Hegel, in the brief period of their collaboration as editors of the Kritisches Journal der Philosophie between 1800 and 1803. In Hegel's works of this period, particularly “Glauben und Wissen,” we see a glimpse of the philosophy of the Middle that might have been, had not both Hegel and Schelling veered away from it, in different directions, a few years later, building upon but defanging the explosive implications of the philosophy of the Middle to make it more compatible with traditional European philosophical concerns, particularly those derived from monotheism. A Chinese‐European comparative approach to the problem of the Absolute as Middle, where the experience of Beauty is literally the concrete sensuous present of this = Absolute, is attempted in this paper, tracking the premises and implications of this strange and tantalizing episode in the history of Western thought.
ISSN03018121 (P); 15406253 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.12322
Hits735
Created date2019.07.03
Modified date2021.09.14



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
585079

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse