|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
聖嚴法師「人性論」之研究及啟示=Research and Inspiration of Theory of Human Nature Proposed by Master Sheng-Yen |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
紀俊吉 (著)=Chi, Chun-chi (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
2021 第八屆漢傳佛教與聖嚴思想國際學術研討會
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2021.06.30 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 財團法人聖嚴教育基金會 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.shengyen.org.tw/index.aspx?lang=cht
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 臺北, 臺灣 [Taipei, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| キーワード | 漢傳佛教=Chinese Buddhism; 儒家思想=Confucianism; 佛性論=Buddhadhatu Theories,; 人間淨土=Pure Land on Earth; 創造的詮釋學=Creative Hermeneutics |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本文主旨在探討釋聖嚴對於「人性論」的理解、觀點和主張。佛教傳入中國後對於傳統人性論議題產生了相當重要的影響。但，揆諸相關文獻發現在比例上，以佛教思想為徑路的人性論研究成果偏低。其中，釋聖嚴是乃當代佛教學者中的領航者之一，對於佛教思想的當代化及人間化頗有發明創見，曾對人性論的內涵提出獨到觀點，然，有部分觀點需要進一步的予以探究和釐清。因此，本文主要問題意識在於：聖嚴對於人性論的主張是什麼？本文將以哲學詮釋學作為研究進路，進一步論證：聖嚴對於荀、孟兩家人性論的解讀立場；聖嚴「人性善惡解脫論」思想的可能意涵；依據本文對聖嚴人性論思想的掌握，嘗試著予以評論並開展相關啟示。首先，聖嚴指出傳統儒家對於人性論的主張停留在當世的立場，荀、孟各有偏頗與不足之處。其次，在這一評論上以佛教義理為基礎，依「佛性」確立性善的根源，據「無明」解釋性惡的遠因，形成「人性善惡解脫論」的內涵及核心。再次，歸納相關思想及主張後發現，在深層意義上，聖嚴人性論思想可建構出｢性三層論｣，內涵包括｢佛性論｣、｢性導善｣、｢性存論｣等三個層次。在思想脈絡上，聖嚴人性論主張屬於｢性善｣的傾向，依循佛教義理的引導，顯示人性經過教育後，具有開展出善性的可能。本文發現聖嚴的人性論思想，可連貫到其戒律學及人間淨土思想脈絡上，最終仍以「成佛」為目標。
This research aims to discuss how Master Sheng-Yen understands, thinks and claims about the theory of human nature. After Buddhism came into China, it has an important influence on issues about traditional human nature theory. However, references to related literature show that there is little result of human nature theory following Buddhism's thoughts. Master Sheng-Yen, as one of leaders of contemporary Buddhism, has innovative thoughts for contemporization and humanization of Buddhism thoughts. Unique viewpoints toward the theory of human nature are proposed. However, further exploration and clarification are needed for a part of the viewpoints. Main problematic awareness for this research is “the claims for human nature theory by Master Sheng-Yen”. Following philosophical hermeneutics, this research goes further to argue for interpretation Master Sheng-Yen gives for human nature theory from Xunzi and Mengzi, possible meanings of “Treatise on the Way to Attain Deliverance Between Good and Evil” from Sheng-Yen. Based on the knowledge we have toward human nature theory from Master Sheng-Yen, we try to comment and develop related inspirations. First, Master Sheng-Yen points out that the argument of traditional Confucianism remains as what goes through the current academic world. Insufficient and biased parts are included in the theories of Xunzi and Mengzi. Secondly, the nature and core of Treatise on the Way to Attain Deliverance Between Good and Evil is formed according to Buddhism, the origin of original goodness of human nature can be ensured on the basis of Buddha-nature, and remote cause of original evilness of human nature according to ignorance (Avidyā). Third, after the induction of related thoughts and claims, we find out that Three-Nature-Layer Theory is constructed based on the theory of human nature proposed by Master Sheng-Yen, including Buddhadhatu Theories. Buddhadhatu Theory guides nature to find its goodness, and Buddhadhatu Existence Theory. For its context of thoughts, human nature theory by Master Sheng-Yen tends to have arguments of original goodness of human nature. Following the guidance of Buddhism, we find out that human nature possibly develops goodness after education. Theory of human nature proposed by Master Sheng-Yen can actually connect to the thought contexts of Buddha discipline (vinaya) and pure land on Earth. The final goal is awakening. Nirvana and Buddhahood have been attained.
|
|---|
| ヒット数 | 637 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.06.14 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
