|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
宗教皈信與轉換—以五顯慈恩寺為例=The Religious Conversion and Transformation : A Case study of Wu-Sian-Cih-En Temple |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
陳瑩琪 (著)=Chen, Ying-chi (au.)
|
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2010 |
|---|
| ページ | 87 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 玄奘大學 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.hcu.edu.tw/hcu/zh-tw
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| 学位 | 修士 |
|---|
| 学校 | 玄奘大學 |
|---|
| 学部・学科名 | 宗教學系碩士在職專班 |
|---|
| 指導教官 | 鄭弘岳=Cheng, Hung-yueh |
|---|
| 卒業年 | 98 |
|---|
| キーワード | 半結構式訪談法=Semi-structural interview method; 五顯大帝=Wu-Sian Great Buddha; 奉獻=commitment; 轉換=transformation; 皈信=conversion |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本研究主要是透過半結構式的訪談方法，訪談主祀道教護法神五顯大帝之台北樹林五顯慈恩寺的資深皈信者，來探討信徒之皈信動機及從道教轉為佛教轉換的原因，並檢視已有的皈信理論，進而整理、歸納出以下結果。
首先在宗教的轉換上，五顯慈恩寺由原來依照道教儀軌祭祀的五顯慈恩堂，是在五顯大帝的帶領下，逐漸轉型成為佛教寺廟，此和Lofland認為人們調整他們的宗教選擇，以便和他們周遭發生的事相一致，改教其實是個再社會化（resocialization）問題，而不是選擇問題之主張，似有類似之處。五顯慈恩寺之轉型，比較特別者是多數受訪者表示，覺得很自然的接受這種由道教轉變為佛教的過程與結果，並没有什麼太大的衝擊，反而更加強信念，認為能夠讓信仰更持久，能提昇意境，透過利益他人的方式來利益自己，此或與五顯大帝在皈信者心目中已建立之慈祥、慈悲、關愛亦師亦父的形象，並利用約二十年時間講解心經及淨土五經，循序漸進帶領皈信者解行佛教義理有關。
至於在皈信的原因上，社會網絡是主要的要素，教義只是其次的元素；而在皈信之後，教義則是留住皈信者的最大原因。根據受訪談的皈信者的回答，他們當初的皈信主要來自親友社會網絡的引薦，而皈信的原因主要係因遭遇重大變故（緊張），及藉宗教手段解決問題兩種因素，皈信後希望自己能更精進，行菩薩道，此印證教義是留住皈信者的最大原因。又以奉獻來說明皈信深淺方面，研究者觀察到，感情的奉獻和工具的奉獻其實是互為因果；這也符合了奉獻理論的犠牲、付出和情感交融是增強奉獻的過程；至於皈信者對五顯慈恩寺產生了歸屬感，這同於Kanter之感情的奉獻。
With the semi-structural interview method, I aimed at and interviewed some senior converts from Wu-Sian-Cih-En Temple, a temple which mainly enshrines Wu-Sian Great Buddha. My research is to find out why they became believers and why they, who had been Taoists at first, transferred themselves into Buddhists. Furthermore, by examining the present converting theory, I have compared and arranged the data, and have finally come up with the conclusion as below.
In the beginning, Wu-Sian-Cih-En Temple, which used to be run with Taoism, has gradually transformed into a Buddhist temple under Wu-Sian Great Buddha’s leading. This is similar to Lofland’s opinion. Lofland thinks people revise their religion in accordance with what happens around them, and that changing one’s religion is a re-socialization problem rather than a selection problem. During the interviews, most respondents indicated they naturally accepted the whole process and result of transformation. On the contrary, they think the transformation has strengthened their faith, made their belief last longer, promoted their state of mind, and benefited themselves by benefiting others. This is also related to the kind, merciful, and caring image of Wu-Sian Great Buddha, who has long played the role of a mentor. Besides, this also has something to do with the fact that Wu-Sian Great Buddha spent about twenty years explaining Heart Sutra and the Five Classics of Pure Land, and led the believers into Buddhist doctrines step by step.
As to the social network is the major vector that makes those believers convert while the religious doctrine is only the minor one. After their conversion, the doctrine becomes the major vector. I find that their conversion is mostly due to the introduction from their relatives and friends. The major cause to make them convert is that they have suffered terrible unforeseen happenings causing them great tension or that they have tried to solve their problems by religion. After conversion, they want to be more specialized in Buddhism and to practice Buddhism. That proves the doctrine has become the strongest vector to hold them. I try to explain the degree of their conversion by commitment. I find the affective commitment and the instrumental commitment are cause and effect mutually. This finding is also consistent with the Theory of Sacrifice: sacrifice, investment, and communion are essential in the process to enhance the contribution. Moreover, just as Kanter’s Affective Commitment, the believers have the feeling that they belong to Wu-Sian-Cih-En Temple. |
|---|
| 目次 | 第一章 緒論............................. 1
第一節 研究動機與目的.................... 1
第二節 研究架構......................... 2
第三節 研究方法......................... 2
第四節 文獻回顧......................... 9
第五節 五顯慈恩寺由道轉佛之歷程........... 25
第二章 五顯大帝形象建構與皈信者未來願景.... 29
第一節 五顯大帝形象的建構................. 29
第二節 皈信者未來願景.................... 34
第三節 小結............................. 36
第三章 信徒的奉獻........................ 37
第一節 五顯大帝信徒的奉獻................. 37
第二節 印證Kanter的奉獻多元向度模式....... 41
第三節 小結............................. 42
第四章 皈信的轉換........................ 45
第一節 皈信前後的比較.................... 45
第二節 皈信轉換的強化.................... 51
第三節 印證Lofland宗教轉換之主張.......... 56
第四節 小結............................. 57
第五章 信徒的皈信........................ 59
第一節 皈信五顯大帝的因素................. 59
第二節 印證Lofland和Stark的皈信歷程模式... 65
第三節 小結............................. 66
第六章 結論與討論........................ 67
附件一：訪談大綱.......................... 71
附件二： 圖1-7 至 圖1-16................. 72
參考文獻................................. 78 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 49 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2023.04.11 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.04.11 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
